You don’t have to be well informed of every little detail to recognize Russian talking points. Yours is way too obvious. And I guess Wikipedia is “nafo script” whatever that is…
Yes, Wikipedia is notoriously edited by western intelligence.
I don’t think you know what “well informed” means. Looks like it just means ‘well trained to reflexively support the western narrative, even without knowing any details.’
“Notoriously”… this is now hilariously bad. This is what I mean about easily recognized. Wikipedia sites their sources. The details are there, and nothing you’ve said so far has made me any better informed.
You don’t have to be well informed of every little detail to recognize Russian talking points. Yours is way too obvious. And I guess Wikipedia is “nafo script” whatever that is…
Yes, Wikipedia is notoriously edited by western intelligence.
I don’t think you know what “well informed” means. Looks like it just means ‘well trained to reflexively support the western narrative, even without knowing any details.’
“Notoriously”… this is now hilariously bad. This is what I mean about easily recognized. Wikipedia sites their sources. The details are there, and nothing you’ve said so far has made me any better informed.
Yeah, they’ve been known to be censoring Wikipedia for almost 20 years.
And now you’re defending western intelligence agencies. You guys are so, so bad at this.
https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/cia-and-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN16428960/