You don’t train someone as an assassin and specifically give them a sword made of the metal that kills Night Kings if you don’t plan on them killing a Night King, first off. It’s also the exact kind of reversal of expectations for conflict resolving that Martin loves and, on the topic, I think the reason we’re never getting his ending is because it’s clear that this was his ending and people hated it.

As for her character arc and revenge, that’s the thing, it’s not revenge, it’s her duty as a Stark. By your own reasoning using her new skills in this way instead of going after the Lannisters or whoever is the inevitable conclusion.

Also, being what he is, I fully expect the leader of the Others in the book to get called a Night King/Night’s King if by some miracle he does actually publish the rest of the series. Yeah there’s all that stuff about that being a historical figure but it’s also the kind of name that becomes a title in its own right.

But, all that said, at this point only Martin really knows what his intentions are and were.

I’d say no one but ourselves but Americans are self deluded cucks and always have been.

It’s a symptom

As someone that just read the books:

Arya killing the night king isn’t just thematically and plot appropriate with like five different chekovs guns shooting his face at once, it’s just cool to have all this magic bullshit fixed with a blade in the dark imo.

The problem is that scene was ugly and poorly filmed with shit tier effects. Plus she basically just yolos at the guy… Have her use her goddamn assassin powers, how hard is that?

Say what you will about the crimes from all sides during the October Revolution, there ain’t any royal Romanovs anymore. Something to think about.

You’re not wrong in the brutal truth of human opinions and interactions but, also:

“You’re not ugly, you’re poor.”

https://youtu.be/A295YT2yd_A

Actually very worth a watch, brought up quite a lot of points I hadn’t really considered before.

This would be a great moment from the captured opposition to pretend they aren’t captured opposition by showing a spine, but the point is they don’t have one, or any significant moral principles for that matter.

Prove me wrong, Labour leader larpers, I dare you.

We can’t say that for sure until the rest of the results return

Only if you think magic is anything you don’t understand

That sounds harsh but I don’t mean it that way, I just find that quote annoying

You don’t have to be good at it, you just have to never give up being a sex pest 😤

If we make this popular enough Trump might get confused and start arresting the puritans

All empires are built on the same sins, but yeah.

I feel like you can wank to yanks if you don’t pay for it?

There’s a core assumption being made here

As they say, fascism is imperialism turned inwards and the slow learners in the room are about to find out that conquered subjects don’t particularly care about the technicalities of the power sharing arrangements of the oligarchs that own them when they talk about the sins of empire.

Lol, how could their lives possibly get worse as a colonial possession indeed.

You can just admit you’re wrong you know. Focusing on the territorial expansion, absolute laughable nonsense btw when talking about one of the largest nations to ever exist, instead of the absolute ruler that is technically required just makes you look willfully ignorant.

Lysenkoism went a little wild in its ideology-first demands

Well, what do you know, some things never change

Bro you’re the next person he’d like to see gone