The Smithsonian has to follow orders, even if they don’t want to because it would mean cutting their funding or ending up freezing it.

There should be an amendment that protects the Smithsonian from this without the risk of having its funds frozen.

I don’t know what bothers Elon more: someone criticizing him because another company does things that he himself does on his platform, someone from the company or organization he left, because he is gay, or all of the above.

Realistically, we learn these manual things by tradition and understand the basics. But in the working world that is automated and we only have to learn other things that are more important.

The Big Four accounting firms offer AI products.

Director of Open AI, Palantir, Mozilla or IBM?

It depends on how Intel is rescued: whether the government nationalizes it completely to become a state-owned company, partial rescue of the company to structure it, conventional rescue, or whether it is placed under federal guardianship for a time and then privatized.

In short, yes, but in certain scenarios.

Arguments in favor of rescuing Intel:

• It is a crucial sector; if a company goes bankrupt, it is difficult to recover for several years, because it is usually difficult for a new company if it does not have sufficient resources and/or support.
• If Intel declares bankruptcy, it would leave AMD with a monopoly on x64 because, without a direct rival to compete with, the price of CPUs is likely to increase and, as a result, the price of PCs would also increase.
• By rescuing Intel, the company can better plan its strategies and make long-term plans without pressure from shareholders to make a profit.
• It would preserve many people’s jobs, keeping unemployment low and without affecting people’s finances.
• Continue to maintain technological sovereignty in the country without the risk of another foreign company buying Intel’s technology.

I wonder if the government will bail out Intel and if it will do so either by paying off its debts or if it will become government property for a while.

In the short term I don’t think so, in the medium term it depends and in the long term it is possible.

I wonder who will win this nuclear fusion race: the United States, Europe, or China?

I would like to see AI tested in the future with certification exams like the CFA Exam, CPA Exam, or university entrance exams like the GaoKao.

I prefer the sphere, than an anime girl

I say Firefox should switch to a more permissive license like BSD, Apache or MIT.

You could use CC BY 4.0 as a first option or the various options offered by Creative Commons, but you could also use the FreeBSD Documentation License, GDFL, or Free Art License.

But if you want it to be in the public domain, you can use CC0 or a license equivalent to the public domain.

What license will the content of Central Hub be under?

There’s a recent user video that explains the advantages, disadvantages, and unique features of FreeBSD.

I hope it helps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk5kJ2iWYaU

Oracle NoSQL Database is released under the CDDL or Apache license

Java being bought by JetBrains and ending up merging Java and Kotlin

The rest in the trash

FreeBSD does not have support for multiple drives, so there may be problems on government computers.

In itself, they will have several drawbacks when moving to Linux because it does not act the same as Windows or macOS.

It was a slow growth for Windows 11

If it still exists, but it is in its niche like virtual reality