When were you circumcised? I’m guessing as a child. Your own parents weren’t satisfied with your penis. It’s fine to accept that you were the victim of a irreversible religious genital modification without your consent and that it doesn’t define you and you won’t let it ruin your life. But making a point of arguing that you’re actually totally okay, that other people are obsessed with your penis specifically and that circumcision as a whole isn’t that bad and kind of passively endorsing it is not fine and betrays a much deeper insecurity on your part than whatever accusations you’re projecting onto me. Nonmedical circumcision has been condemned by the overwhelming majority of the world for centuries, and continues to be so today

But it’s cleaner and easier to manage

Both complete lies btw

Your penis doesn’t work just fine if you were circumcised. You are one of the brainwashed people I was talking about.

Read about the function of the foreskin, which is way more than a bit of hanging skin on the end of your member, it’s a sensitive and double-sided tissue that keeps your internal bits where they belong.

In my experience, the strongest critics of MGM are victims of circumcision. There are some brainwashed people who don’t see what the big deal is, but people with normal penises (and women) don’t seem to care much one way or the other.

Genital mutilation is weird, doubly so when it’s for a religion you don’t even follow

Are you a communist or something? What’s wrong with you?

You thought PPP inflation was bad?

What’s the financial angle?

90% of people do not care about this

Meal prep as much as possible. If you hate cooking but realize it’s got to be done, might as well cook double at a time so you can relax the next night.

It would help to know what types of cooking/foods you prefer if you want more specific shortcuts

Even Ed Zitron has mellowed out in the last year with the rationalist opinion of “it’s a probabilistic model being asked to do deterministic things,” and “it makes the easy things easier and the harder things harder.”

The overwheling majority of “anti AI” comments I see are either 1) anti LLM, B) anti hyperscaler business / marketing practices, C) anti data center, or usually D) any combination of the above. Very little about the objective, architectural functions of language models.

If you want a machine learning model that actually works, you need to feed it good data. If you hire an AI slop enthusiast to feed the model mass junk data, you will have a bad time.

You understand the strawmanning and logical fallacy here right? A person can appreciate novel technologies from afar, understand when/if theyre appropriate for their job, and then do their unrelated work just fine without a personality purity test

Mike will get it done

Cioran vindicated. Ligotti - We are all uncanny things. May we all march gracefully out.

The potus has the power to remove regulation across the board but very little to actually enforce them. If new rules mean 1 in 4 chicken nuggets has salmonella, that’s on Trump. But if Republican states want to stonewall & ignore food safety inspections, that’s not on Biden.

Chuck Schumer has got his most serious pen out for this one! You know, the one with the skulls on it he got from Myrtle Beach

I deadass got called ableist on here once for saying theres no excuse to not be using an ad blocker because of someone’s “executive dysfunction”

Lmao okay smooth brain. I tested in the 99th percentile on my last test. I wasnt even at my peak cognitive powers and I wasnt mentally challenged at all.

Its whatever I say it is to get rid of people who annoy me

Low IQ people shouldn’t breed and I believe this 100% at this point

E: this is literally the argument of Idiocracy btw