You give them too much credit. Our actual police don’t have a great track record, and they aren’t exactly well trained or educated.

Ice are the bottom of the barrel schoolyard bullies who couldn’t cope with actual jobs and are using the little power they have to beat the living s*** out of their friends and neighbors and when they pull down the mask they hope to have a nice brunch with the same people on the weekend.

Way to judge someone else’s hobbies. Sheesh.

Gotta up your game, my dude!

Get up out of your gaming chair and do something about little keyboard warrior.

That’s actually a pretty funny claim. You do seem to be projecting a bit.

My Ph.D. is in AI. Among other things I teach AI and other related subfields as well as computing ethics (a metric fuckton over the years). I study and publish on the state of AI systems and their ethical concerns and limitations. I’m currently working on policy for my university system.

Each day I wake up and a portion of my responsibilities are to instill ethical behaviors in my students, and to support the world and policies around me in this area.

I’m curious, Mr. Troll, are you doing anything in this particular arena besides popping a blood vessel over something that some random dude in the internet thinks?

And why haven’t you “stopped it at the source” if it bothers you so much that you’re randomly attacking people on internet forums.

Shit, you are absolutely right. Why didn’t I create laws and society that disallowed Musk to become who he is.

Sorry about the oversight;

I think you are attempting to inject far too much reason into bigotry. I think the only people who find it internally consistent are themselves.

They imagine exactly what you believe. They tell themselves that it is a strictly human thing, which allows them to frame it as a choice–one that they can judge as morally wrong.

Sexuality, gender expression, etc.–all are dismissible through profound ignorance.

Being able to use an LLM turns a layman into a coder no more than being able to use CAD turns them into an engineer.

Perfect analogy.

You very much embody the spirit of the reddit “big brain.”

Really I’ve only rearticulated the same one-point repeatedly. I’m a bit shocked that we don’t both hold consensus on that fact. But that’s been my entire point.

You are correct about one thing, you do remind me of Reddit. Somebody comes in with a difference of opinion and they must be flat out wrong.

It is a program. You stop the program at the source. And you do that by going after to do two authorize the program.

It really isn’t that hard. We are discussing the world getting flooded with dangerous and illegal images and we should hold the man who actually did it in a great deal of contempt.

And chemical castration (or any other form) is about the least effective way of dealing with it. It is brutal and ugly for no reason.

One of my life’s inspirations was chemically castrated. It is a horrible thing to have to go through.

The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.

Those drugs are actually of dubious utility unless you are just seeking to cause medical harm to people.

And it has absolutely no bearing on AI. No amount of chemicals will stop grok, and from what I hear Elon’s genitals may already be mangled and useless.

You stop this sort of thing at the source.

Wrong. YOU INTERPRETED IT THAT WAY.

To use your words you seem triggered. You ok, bro?

So, what you are saying is that we can’t make judgement calls and that all crimes matter?

You really haven’t managed to say anything otherwise.

I’m suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.

You are essentially arguing that “all crimes matter,” which isn’t wrong but is woefully misguided.

It is about the framing of the narrative.

I love art with a meaning. This one has a powerful statement. It says " I need context ."

Strange that this particular incident was the one that crossed the line.

Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.

The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.

That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn’t even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.

If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of “oh, yea, that’s bad, too.”

Sometimes that does happen.

Nope. Just think that we should all recognize the root evil here is the Nazi billionaire that is selling a child porn subscription service.

You know. Because Nazi billionaires selling child porn subscription services is a real actual terrible thing.