

wow, cool! I just watched episode 4 last night, so this is timely!
Mostly @andypiper@macaw.social on the #fediverse - more links here.
Keyoxide aspe:keyoxide.org:JQTSX3JMH2G6U6UAUH5VPUP4SE


wow, cool! I just watched episode 4 last night, so this is timely!


absolutely agreed. It is all connected with Bandwagon (which federates) and Mirlo etc.
BTW when The Indie Beat Radio came along, I made a GNOME extension for that. I should add a link to TIB TV to the extension, but I haven’t gotten around to that yet.


That may have been some time ago? The team has been larger than just Eugen for quite a while now. In terms of “won’t be compatible with the majority of AP implementations”, is there a specific PR that has been changed to make something incompatible? I’m not sure I understand what you are describing. I’d love to know where we can improve, here.


We are big fans of them!


Absolutely. In fact I wrote exactly that last year.


Completely agree that this “feels like” a centralisation vector. That’s not the intent of it, and if you read the blog post we make it clear that we want many Mastodon servers, everywhere, rather than one organisation hosting them all. This is to do two things - 1) get us a more sustainable financial foundation that is less dependent on grant cycles and 2) enable the larger institutions (EU Commission being an existing example) to get set up on the Fediverse.


Can confirm there are no plans for this to happen or be attempted. We’re getting the new European non-profit worked out (more news soon), no changes to the licensing.


pretty sure the answer is no, specific hardware only.


The plan is to fully implement this by Mastodon 4.5 later in the year.


That is the plan, you can see more in our previous blog post.


Perhaps not, perhaps so, but we do have other folks offering support and we will do what we can to get to a better situation here.


Mastodon comms person here. We’re discussing how we go forward. The questions being asked are all absolutely reasonable, and we want to do what we can to improve the terms (that we do need to have in place) taking into account the feedback and offers of support.
Not compatible with GNOME 49/50? :-(