This wreaks of something. I just looked up the numbers for students and staff there, and we are talking like 100+ years to get that many people worth of records. I understand it has been around long enough for that… but most of it would be extremely out of relevance.
Workforce Breakdown
• Research & Development (R&D): Roughly 31,000 employees (about 74% of the workforce) work in R&D and engineering.
• Operations & Support: About 11,000 employees handle sales, marketing, operations, and administrative roles.
• Geography: Approximately 55% of Nvidia’s workforce is based in North America, with the remainder distributed across regions like South Asia and East Asia.
this data is from revelio labs, and seems to be acked up by Macrotrends and Yahoo Finance
I once asked the waiter what happens if i don’t say when, and he said they are trained to know how to shave about 2 ounces off, at which time they will stop, and in places with a grinder that has cheese in it they generally have 1-2 ounces in, and stop when it does. So now I get 2 ounces of shredded parm.
If you look up median, or average, net worth of Nvidia employees you will find that according to internal survey, at least 76% of employees are worth over 1 million dollars, with 50% being worth more than 25 million.
they are the reader, not part of the story
Not really no. Every country, and culture, has their dehumanized other.
Did you ask him what he though inspired those landscapes? Why they all seem to look suspiciously similar in a foundational level?
What if they side with the godhead?
You don’t have to do that though, you choose to, for your own reasons.
Non-medication reasons for high potassium is usually related to bad kidneys. Hyperkalemia is the term, and it is mostly associated with poor filtering function from the kidneys, things like polycystic kidney disease, stones, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure/mild kidney failure, Adison’s disease, and congestive heart failure
They did this once a year in every school I attended until I was in high school (military kid). I started high school in the mid 90s, and attended school in 4 different countries.
There used to be this small development near me that was very rich, but due to the rather extreme hilliness of the area they were a pain in the ass to get to unless you climbed through wooded hills. Well, my house was in a position where there was a rather short path over to their little area. We once did it last thinking they wouldn’t have any candy, but decided they might, so lets go. Turns out almost everyone there had kids, so they all handed out candy, then drove their kids the main part of the the town so they could meet their friends. This place was a gold mine, multiple full size candy bars from one house, whole packages of cookies, and other snacks, from another, pepsi big slams from yet another.
One guy however gave out roles of quarters. 10 dollars, to kids, in 1993. That was the absolute GOAT of Halloween. We made effort to start there from that point on.
Eh, the edit history things seems to only exist in some forks/instances who added it themselves, and is not a standard feature of Lemmy.
I edited two typos, and i did it before you replied. Try again. I think in Lemmy you can see the previous comments if you don’t believe me.
“According to the Chinese news south South China Morning News there are 81 billionaires across China’s congress, and it’s advisory board.”
This sentence means that according to Chinese estimates there are 81 billionaires in China’s legislature. That is a lot of billionaires in a legislature. To show that this is a lot I will later compare it to the US, as a demonstration of just how much it is.
“According to Hurun Report there are 209 people across these bodies that have more than 100 million dollars.” Same as before, but this time people with over 100 million dollars, which is a lot as well.
“According to a variety of Chinese sources the majority of the people making up these government bodies have more than 1 million dollars.” This is a third point showing that China’s congress is very wealthy.
“It is widely agreed China’s legislature, if not the richest, would be in second place.”
This sentence is saying that the consensuses is that China is the most, or the second most, wealthy legislature in the world.
“To make a comparison the 50 richest people of the US congress are worth a combined 1.6 billion, and China’s top 50 are worth 95 billion. China also has a per capita amount of congress members that exceeds the US significantly in millionaires.”
This compares the top 50 wealthiest of the US congress to the Chinese congress. The US being a well known legislature, who has an infamously large amount of wealth among it’s members, makes it a good example for this type of comparison. It shows China’s top 50 has much more wealth than the US’s top 50.
“The richest person in US congress is Darrell Issa with 355 million. The richest person in China’s congress is Zong Qinghou with 19 billion”
This is a comparison between the wealthiest individuals between the two legislatures, again showing China’s holds much larger wealth.
So, what part about this was so hard to parse, for you, that you came out thinking this was a “but what about the US” statement, rather than a comment saying how much wealth China’s legislature has, and that it is probably the wealthiest in the world, by using a comparison to the US’s legislature, another well known, and wealthy legislature?
yes, but he is not the original comic strip maker, the comic ran from the 50s-70s
Good point