This reads like Zuck trying to insert himself as it was apparent to him that Elon was making a name for himself in the admin, had unprecedented access, and Zuck wanted a piece of that.

Funnily, he’s acting exactly like Elon did in the Epstein emails. “Yo yo fellow govt efficiency aficionados! I got my teams on high alert to help you guyz out! Let me know when’s the cool stuff happening!”

I thought they were mining the strait? How are they gonna control who hits the mines?

lol they centered the Taj Mahal photo on him instead of the whole family, which makes it look like an amateur job.

One thing to note is more often people here reply with genuine comments and in good faith. There is also a lack of clever snarky comments and baiting due to the lack of karma system.

One of the things the article says is that “most people want newer phones” (if they could afford it). Do y’all feel that way?

I think I wouldn’t switch my 4 year old device even if someone gave me a new one for free. Just the hassle of changing to a new phone is not worth it when the new phone isn’t that much better. I’m just so over “tech”. I don’t have that excitement of new gadgets anymore.

Tabloid quality article with clickbait headline. I would avoid this site.

Depending on when it was inflation could drive their costs up 3-5% over a year. When your margins are basically fixed by the govt at 12%, it makes sense to cover as much cost as they can.

The whole incentive structure is messed up because the govt “runs” defense companies like they are state owned without actually just making them state owned, or just letting them actually be private.

Slow Clap

If I take the question at face value, I don’t see it being dishonest. Perhaps you are reading into some subutle cue that I’m not.

Bad link