nonetheless thanks you make me see more side that I was missing
Going Luddite didn’t work last time. Giving corporations the sole monopoly again will be a mistake
I agree that maybe 10% will not use AI but most of the public may/wil use and the system become more likely that if we don’t convince public that will be same mistake
It still strange for me most of thing I did with LLMs is doable with Terminal tools (I really like them)
And I can’t help but wonder how many people that never comment but are always there decided to drop as well.
sorry, thats not something that I can access :D
you’re right I should be more clear but,
And OP is not even attacking the information itself
Because I’m not a security expert but I do know that promoting the same thing on different-look websites that belong to the same group is not something we should allow
also I updated the post with explanations of that github accounts and more detail
they stay
You also still have not provided any proof that the random lemmy account you linked (which has been inactive for 3 years) is a troll
you’re right I put wrong user link on post I’m sorry and I explained the reason (still I don’t know why this happened)
and I updated post now it’s clearer;
it has zero mention of how the websites belong to the GrapheneOS devs
don’t forget Google also used it that operation
well if they don’t Chinese models will swallow them
Not using WindowsOS/MacOS is a very big step for them and FOSS
so please don’t care that much about distros :) and see the bright side: They are not using WindowsOS/MacOS
they treat llms as a oracle :::)
I think in the long run it benefited it as a resource.
Wikipedia is GREAT, why I missed this treasure for years
but if we don’t get new young editors in 10 years we may lose this treasure nytimes archive.org theguardian
I may beliave that but how can we fix “model collapse” or any other core problem?
got a text about the day’s weather and whether he should plan a bit more time for getting his kids ready when it was going to rain
we have this tech for 10 years…
rather the model tell me which tooling I can use
as I mention before “it’s just simulate current information and it creates a loop (it’ll always follow current trends)”
It will never/rarely promote any grey area thing (eg: torrents, shadow-libraries, paywall bypass, not following ToS…)
and apparently Anthropic, OpenAI (is the lead at censoring hiding in a mask of “safety”) and looks like Google don’t care that much “safety”, for now
How can I trust this kind of thing??
Look what Claude said me about bypass paywall;
- Incognito/private browsing — Works on some soft paywalls
- Disable JavaScript — Some client-side paywalls rely on it
- Articles shared on social media sometimes bypass meters
what?! it’s lawyering me with cheap tactics?
and it said this!
Subscriptions to 1–2 key outlets can be very affordable
I won’t subscribe to a news site for just to read one article it’s stupid to pay $12 (unlimited news for 1 month) I don’t want unlimited, count all your articles and divide by $12 than I will pay this for each article I read.
As you can see this stupid parrots is reducing any new thing, new tool, new brands, new platforms, new opinion, new system, new ideology…
This is highly authoritarian and thanks right now I hate it more than ever
No problem, in a world of rising zero-click searches/content :( you are a rare find
yeah and it’s like shadowbanning you can’t know what’s missing
I think it’s for legal reasons.
I’ll decide again after 1 week