I bet Shakespeare is so freaking psyched he gets to meet Patrick Stewart.

Well you obviously shit in the room on the right, cause that’s the one where you moon the toilet.

I usually see it as a man saying “I don’t like women”, then someone else mistakes them for a sexist and says “that’s not good”, then THEY get mistaken for a homophobe. Hence “(character) is homophobic?”

This person needs a shower.

It certainly is a take. I’ll let you know if anyone has a take like that so you can dunk on them. Be sure to let them know that enjoyment has no bearing on slavery one way or the other, while you’re at it.

“It’s not slavery if they enjoy it” is certainly a take.

Ah, but if AI have souls, then this is slavery and you’re going straight to hell for it.

If I take a shower, that won’t suddenly make me attractive to girls. And yet, if I don’t take a shower, my stench will make me unattractive to girls.

On second thoughts, the “why bother voting” crowd would probably struggle with an analogy about taking a shower.

Now draw her trying to steal a pie from a window.

They believe in “my body, my choice”, but they also believe in “your body, my choice.” Obviously, the one making all the decisions should be some random fucknut who thinks science is elitist.

It’s just a keysmash

And one of those sides is a 20.

I think his fingers-on-head deduction pose was a reference to Furuhata Ninzaburo, which makes sense for him to reference. Almost the entire series is on archive.org for free, so you can check that out for yourself if you like.

Robert Caro disagrees. Power does not corrupt, it reveals. If you somehow became a billionaire, you’d be able to do whatever you wanted, which means we’d be able to see what you wanted to do. If you start acting evil once you get money, it means you were evil but unable to act on it until you had money.

Specifically about Amazon, Bezos made it because he wanted to cash in on the early internet with his own startup, leaving a Wall Street firm to do so. And, yes, we was a dick to his only employee, which is why the man quit after only 5 years.

They made one comment. It’s a bit early to start drawing conclusions.

If you want an alternative, how about not giving it all to anyone? How about judging the company on their values and practices rather than their size?

You hit a false dichotomy. “Not your allies” does not automatically mean “class traitors”. They might be neutral.

Remember: Just because a business is small doesn’t mean it’s automatically better. For example, if Bezos ran a corner shop with only three employees, he’d still try and stop them from taking toilet breaks.

My assumption is First Time Mother.

In apartment terms:

The 196 landlords wanted to move to another city because they didn’t like this city’s mayor’s authority. The 196 tenants like the city, because it’s inclusive and the mayor is a pretty cool gal, and saw the landlords’ city of choice as significantly worse for a LOT of reasons. Regardless, the landlords locked the building and expected all the tenants to move with them at a moment’s notice.

So some cool people found a different building in the original city and used that, all while telling the original landlords how dumb and bad they were for their little stunt. The original landlords eventually relented and opened the old building, but the new building remained with different landlords.

No, a tool is a thing someone uses to carry out their design by themself. An AI does it for you without any input after the initial instruction. They are not tools any more than an employee is.

You’re either an idiot or a liar. I’ll let you decide which, but as I said before, I am done with you. I’m sure, as someone who assumes and mocks someone else’s feelings, you’ll take this with grace and move on from a lost cause.