Yeah, the user didn’t give a time limit.
They could have just run it slow.

It’s easy if you trained the model on the disassembled Skyrim binary.

Yeah this stuff is rage bait

There are some people out there that have the power to create policies but also for some reason want to do good for people in general. Except that they don’t understand tech. This is to bait them into becoming “for AI”.

Also, to help others make excuses for adding AI.

They are made to look like steel, because good quality steel is expensive as compared to the materials they use in it.

The flooring?
IDK what that BS is. I’d rather have granite, which is again, a luxury because it is hard to machine.

I guess some people would be happy to show how their space-ful codebases have higher gzip compression ratio than tabbed ones.

Tabs are the cheaper alternative.

-1 ∵ Those were spaces you put there.

You thought you could fool me?

“story told by photo craft”

Another real life simulation game.

Yes. ! vs .

I don’t see nothing!

Isn’t this something that only means so, in the recently developed dialects?

I mean if it were instead, “> I don’t see nothing.”, I would understand it as the person is actually seeing something.

Well they did leave out a lot of important information.

This site seems pretty good though: https://gpg.fail/
It has all the given vulnerabilities in text.

Now just need to read and understand all of them and find out which one explains the above comment and the answer to my question is probably another headache.

The above question came to me after watching the video.
IDK maybe I just have low IQ.

Alright, so just because a plain text signature is along with content, doesn’t mean that the content is signed.
Then how do you check that the content is signed by the plain-text signature given with it?

I thought that the signature means that either a whole copy of the text is encrypted or a hash of the text is encrypted using the private key, which would mean that spoofing the sign would require solving complexity equal to either of:

• Finding another string that gives the same hash
• Finding the private key and signing a new hash with it

What am I missing?

Actually I was suggesting that the service having compressed it with some AI-based tool ironically made the scanner’s report correct.
The actual scanner was probably BS anyway and would have even flagged the original.

It is likely compressed using some AI tool before saving on their servers.

I have got 3 maybe-babies lying in my fridge rn.

I too have been getting too less sunlight exposure and too much cigarette smoke exposure whenever I get out.
Perhaps I should check if a relevant blood test is available here.

the people most critical of AI have been those that trained their own one at home for fun

I wish this applied to me, but I never got any ideas to have fun with AI and there were enough things more interesting that I couldn’t get the time. And now, I don’t have the computing power to make any significant thing.

Weren’t NFT bros mostly exit scammers themselves?