When using WSL, be sure to not mention anything about that when reporting bugs because that’ll just confuse the issue for the maintainers. They like having that casually mentioned about 20 messages into the troubleshooting process.
WSL is cool when you first use it then you realize it actually kind of sucks
Yea… But I have 3 Linux VMs running in Hyper-V. That counts for something right?
It is honestly better
When someone ask for help with a Linux issue: 🤩
It’s a wsl bug: 🤭
Open source now tho
What’s the benefit for that? Can you fork it and run a copy in windows (or is it too integrated in wondows) or is it just Microsoft wanting your free labour (bugfixes etc)?
Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power
Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power
I think that sounds more like Cygwin.
Omg I haven’t heard of cygwin in years! the nightmares…
Oh no, Linux users are jealous that Windows is the best distro out there!
Anyways…
In this case it’s a bloated hypervisor, no?
No.
Care to elaborate what makes WSL better than plain Linux with something like qemu or docker?
This sort of elitism really hurts adoption
