The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWell, that seems badmedia.piefed.worldimagemessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down16
arrow-up1616arrow-down1imageWell, that seems badmedia.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square75linkfedilink
minus-squareunfreeradical@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months agoI think we may assume corporations would still be allowed to operate VPN. The ban would target commercial services that provide anonymity.
minus-squareDecq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 months agoWell then just start a VPN service where everyone is an employee instead of an user. Problem solved.
minus-squareunfreeradical@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoLoopholes are allowed for corporations and the wealthy. The rest of us live under a draconian implementation of the law.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI smell a business opportunity.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 months agoFirstly it’s not going to happen this is just something someone’s claim to they can make a thread. Zero sources posted. Secondly I’d like to see you craft a law that allows corporate VPNs but not private VPNs and doesn’t have any loopholes in it.
minus-squarebtsax@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoLaws don’t need to be meticulously worded to be logically consistent. They just need to be selectively enforced, like most other laws, to have the desired effect.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoExcept that’s not how the law works. If you want the law to work it has to be logically enforceable if it isn’t logically enforceable it will get challenged in court.
I think we may assume corporations would still be allowed to operate VPN. The ban would target commercial services that provide anonymity.
Well then just start a VPN service where everyone is an employee instead of an user. Problem solved.
Loopholes are allowed for corporations and the wealthy.
The rest of us live under a draconian implementation of the law.
“Rules for thee, not for me.”
I smell a business opportunity.
Firstly it’s not going to happen this is just something someone’s claim to they can make a thread. Zero sources posted.
Secondly I’d like to see you craft a law that allows corporate VPNs but not private VPNs and doesn’t have any loopholes in it.
Laws don’t need to be meticulously worded to be logically consistent. They just need to be selectively enforced, like most other laws, to have the desired effect.
Except that’s not how the law works.
If you want the law to work it has to be logically enforceable if it isn’t logically enforceable it will get challenged in court.