• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, it certainly comes across as you arguing for the opposite since you above, reiterated

    The real thing to talk about is the presence or absence of a victim.

    Which has never been an issue. It has never mattered in CSAM if it’s fictional or not. It’s the depiction that is illegal.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok. You’re right. You saying it’s ok to depict CSAM if there isn’t a victim is not you arguing the opposite. It’s me lying.

        You’re so smart. Good job.

    • dantel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is it so hard to admit that you misunderstood the comment ffs? It is painfully obvious to everyone.