It’s amazing how you wrote so much and yet said so little. I read your novel twice looking for a thesis to respond to, but there isn’t one… so I ended up reading a third time, and there’s still nothing. This whole essay of yours is literally nothing more than a collection of ad hom fallacies. I know this fallacy has become a buzzword, but the actual definition of it applies here. It’s literally just name calling me names like a hundred times. I tried to look past the insults to what your point is, but you don’t actually have a point, the insults are the point.
The thing that I don’t understand is that why you even wrote whatever this is in the first place? Not only is it giving me second hand embarrassment, but it also would’ve so much simpler, more mature, and more effective for you to just ask questions in good faith and then have me answer. I would’ve answered you and we could’ve had a discussion. Instead, you choose this and showed that you’re engaging in bad faith for no good reason.
You are just retarded. After all, you consider this a good argument:
“When has Hasan manipulated people?”
You: “All the time. How can you not see it?”
You also think communists or socialists should never enjoy some luxuries like getting a big home or a nice car. You do that because you want people like Hasan to not have capital, and make it easier for pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein and all his capitalist friends to crush him. You felt so called out that, instead of addressing that, you are relying on this nonsense comment, acting like you are the calm one, the normal one, calling me insane for writing a lot or whatever, instead of addressing this shit I made it clear.
The idea of self-hosting a livestreaming platform is also fucking stupid, but you cannot address it anymore, because I can actually prove you wrong with that.
At least answer the question I made you, I am sure a lot of people are interested in that answer alone: Who do you recommend we should listen to instead?
It’s amazing how you wrote so much and yet said so little. I read your novel twice looking for a thesis to respond to, but there isn’t one… so I ended up reading a third time, and there’s still nothing. This whole essay of yours is literally nothing more than a collection of ad hom fallacies. I know this fallacy has become a buzzword, but the actual definition of it applies here. It’s literally just name calling me names like a hundred times. I tried to look past the insults to what your point is, but you don’t actually have a point, the insults are the point.
The thing that I don’t understand is that why you even wrote whatever this is in the first place? Not only is it giving me second hand embarrassment, but it also would’ve so much simpler, more mature, and more effective for you to just ask questions in good faith and then have me answer. I would’ve answered you and we could’ve had a discussion. Instead, you choose this and showed that you’re engaging in bad faith for no good reason.
You are just retarded. After all, you consider this a good argument:
“When has Hasan manipulated people?” You: “All the time. How can you not see it?”
You also think communists or socialists should never enjoy some luxuries like getting a big home or a nice car. You do that because you want people like Hasan to not have capital, and make it easier for pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein and all his capitalist friends to crush him. You felt so called out that, instead of addressing that, you are relying on this nonsense comment, acting like you are the calm one, the normal one, calling me insane for writing a lot or whatever, instead of addressing this shit I made it clear.
The idea of self-hosting a livestreaming platform is also fucking stupid, but you cannot address it anymore, because I can actually prove you wrong with that.
At least answer the question I made you, I am sure a lot of people are interested in that answer alone: Who do you recommend we should listen to instead?