• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Paramount Decree was repealed in Trump I. In any case it isn’t relevant, as it dealt with a monopoly situation where one company controlled the distribution and exhibition for a territory. This isn’t the case for streaming as the consumer can choose between several services.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ultimately it doesn’t matter if consumers can choose between different services if the services don’t have the same “content” due to exclusive rights.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It was not irrelevant, as one studio would control the only cinema accessible in an area.

            Unless studios become ISPs which have monopoly in a town say, and block all but their own streaming service, the concept of monopoly is irrelevant.