Yes, in fact, I just recently on Lemmy heard about a boy that apparently (allegedly) shoved a tent stake up TACOman’s rectum and then stomped on it. I have no trouble believing young boys and girls were both raped and trafficked. I don’t think history is as hetero-normative as you suggest. Children have forever been a target of the elite.
Well, that’s horrific. I just listened to a bit of his testimony, or whatever you want to call it, and now I feel bad about making that exact point.
But are you really trying to assert that statistically, the people partying with Epstein in order to abuse children are not overwhelmingly male, and that the victims are not overwhelmingly girls? Because I’ve heard quite a bit of testimony and it is about rich men abusing young girls.
The context was that I was accused of “unnecessary sexism” for my earlier comment and you’re arguing against me.
If you don’t want to argue that I was being unnecessarily sexist, and you just want to nitpick minor points, then it would help if you’d make that clear.
Yes, of course. You cannot be serious. One, he’s the only male victim that I’ve heard of, and I’ve only just heard of him. Every news source talks about victims as girls or “young women.” So, every news source, even to this very day also implies that that class doesn’t exist.
When I tried to search for his story, I had to use more than one search engine to find anything. DuckDuckGo literally had zero results for “Trump ‘tent stake’”. I had to go to google.
I’m glad that you’re out there letting people know about this guy, but you know that his class is a small minority and almost unknown to the mainstream.
Yes, in fact, I just recently on Lemmy heard about a boy that apparently (allegedly) shoved a tent stake up TACOman’s rectum and then stomped on it. I have no trouble believing young boys and girls were both raped and trafficked. I don’t think history is as hetero-normative as you suggest. Children have forever been a target of the elite.
Well, that’s horrific. I just listened to a bit of his testimony, or whatever you want to call it, and now I feel bad about making that exact point.
But are you really trying to assert that statistically, the people partying with Epstein in order to abuse children are not overwhelmingly male, and that the victims are not overwhelmingly girls? Because I’ve heard quite a bit of testimony and it is about rich men abusing young girls.
I literally responded to a point you made about young boys not being a target, not sure what you’re firing at right now
The context was that I was accused of “unnecessary sexism” for my earlier comment and you’re arguing against me.
If you don’t want to argue that I was being unnecessarily sexist, and you just want to nitpick minor points, then it would help if you’d make that clear.
Nitpick minor comments, like an entire class of minors you implied didn’t exist? Ok pal, have a good one.
Yes, of course. You cannot be serious. One, he’s the only male victim that I’ve heard of, and I’ve only just heard of him. Every news source talks about victims as girls or “young women.” So, every news source, even to this very day also implies that that class doesn’t exist.
When I tried to search for his story, I had to use more than one search engine to find anything. DuckDuckGo literally had zero results for “Trump ‘tent stake’”. I had to go to google.
I’m glad that you’re out there letting people know about this guy, but you know that his class is a small minority and almost unknown to the mainstream.