What’s AI generated? The story is hallucinations? Or a fake post created by a prompt to it? Real story but written by AI? AI graphics?
On the thread there are some links to studies doing the same or similar, so I wouldn’t just assume its a lie. The article makes my skepticism go on high alert though
No I mean it’s literally AI generated. I am super confident. I work on these models on a daily basis so I know it when I see it. Sorry that doesn’t fit into your preconceived worldview.
AI detectors don’t work on the latest generation, they’re all trained on older open source models. You can usually tell AI generated stuff by the em dashes, the tone, and the contrast-driven sentence structure.
E.g. the most AI generated sentence is “That’s not being rude—that’s self-care .”
This one looks like Grok. It has a tendency to generate short sentences and pithy one liners like “Let that sink in.”
No, you cannot tell AI by use of emdashes and this common claim just makes people look even more illiterate than they already did. Real people use emdashes and we’re not going to stop.
Real people also like to use short sentences to make them more impactful.
You write with too much confidence, I think. I work on these models professionally so I don’t know what to tell you besides your surface level understanding of LLMs seems wrong. 🤷♀️
Models do use emdashes disproportionately often, along with shorter sentences than the average human, because they are trained with RLHF where humans rate the model outputs based on their preferences. This is different than copying human behavior as you suggested they do. With RLHF (and later more efficient methods), humans tended to rate models that used emdashes and that had shorter, matter of fact sentences higher because it projected more confidence. In fact, models that were confidently wrong were more likely to be rated higher than models that were unconfidently correct.
Respectfully, if you do the stereotypical armchair expert thing and double down, I will block you. I don’t have the patience to deal with people incorrectly mansplaining my own field to me. I just want to spread knowledge.
It’s a nice story and all but it’s clearly AI generated and I’m not a fan of that
What’s AI generated? The story is hallucinations? Or a fake post created by a prompt to it? Real story but written by AI? AI graphics?
On the thread there are some links to studies doing the same or similar, so I wouldn’t just assume its a lie. The article makes my skepticism go on high alert though
I don’t like the people who claim everything bad is AI created. They act like as if shit journalism and media wasn’t a thing before AI existed.
No I mean it’s literally AI generated. I am super confident. I work on these models on a daily basis so I know it when I see it. Sorry that doesn’t fit into your preconceived worldview.
Yeah clearly AI
I ran it through several AI detectors and none came up positive for AI
AI detectors don’t work on the latest generation, they’re all trained on older open source models. You can usually tell AI generated stuff by the em dashes, the tone, and the contrast-driven sentence structure.
E.g. the most AI generated sentence is “That’s not being rude—that’s self-care .”
This one looks like Grok. It has a tendency to generate short sentences and pithy one liners like “Let that sink in.”
No, you cannot tell AI by use of emdashes and this common claim just makes people look even more illiterate than they already did. Real people use emdashes and we’re not going to stop.
Real people also like to use short sentences to make them more impactful.
The LLMs “learned” these from humans, after all.
You write with too much confidence, I think. I work on these models professionally so I don’t know what to tell you besides your surface level understanding of LLMs seems wrong. 🤷♀️
Models do use emdashes disproportionately often, along with shorter sentences than the average human, because they are trained with RLHF where humans rate the model outputs based on their preferences. This is different than copying human behavior as you suggested they do. With RLHF (and later more efficient methods), humans tended to rate models that used emdashes and that had shorter, matter of fact sentences higher because it projected more confidence. In fact, models that were confidently wrong were more likely to be rated higher than models that were unconfidently correct.
Sources cited:
Respectfully, if you do the stereotypical armchair expert thing and double down, I will block you. I don’t have the patience to deal with people incorrectly mansplaining my own field to me. I just want to spread knowledge.