• arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Among them, “entering houses without permission to use the bathroom,” “break-ins,” “littering,” and people “defecating in private yards” and “complaining when residents catch them.”

    I really don’t understand how a tourist can think any of this makes sense. Like, would they do this in their country too?

  • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Worth reviewing what type of sanitation services are available. If people are completely ignoring adequate public recepticles and bathrooms then that can be addressed a variety of ways but that seems relatively less likely in my opinion.

    Especially with people breaking into homes to use the bathroom. Hard to imagine anyone resorting to this except out of sheer desperation, which would suggest that the number of people being invited over is simply too many for the infrastructure to handle.

    If the infrastructure is inadequate to handle the volume of people then cancelling the event or limiting visitors is the responsible thing to do. It will come with an economic hit (I imagine quite a few businesses see increased sales volume during the festival) but for the dignity of both the tourists and residents it’s important not to stretch the existing infrastructure beyond capacity.

    Would be interesting to hear what the tourists perspective have been over the past few years, especially if the issue got this bad.

    • udon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You have never been to Japan, have you? If any country in the world has excellent public bathroom infrastructure, it’s Japan. Always clean, generally free, and within 1-2 minutes walking range.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The already existing infrastructure may be of good quality but it doesn’t really matter if the capacity isn’t there to meet the volume of people.

        In fact, let’s agree that your point is true. Wouldn’t people want to use those immaculately maintained facilities and, if they aren’t, could it be because the wait is too long?

        I have trouble buying a narrative that any person chose to skip over a widely available well maintained public toilet to break into a person’s home and use their bathroom. You should too.

        • udon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I agree that most people wouldn’t opt for that, but most tourists also don’t behave like that. The vast majority behaves very well, they are somewhat aware of Japanese manners and try to adapt (sometimes in sweet, dorky ways, but who am I to judge, I probably look the same).

          There are a few people who do this and they ruin the image for everyone.

          The issue is not the infrastructure, really. It is excellent and in excellent condition, across the country.

          Imagine you have perfect toilets, some even designed by star architects, free to use for everyone and clean. And some fucker just decides to take a dump in someone’s garden, for whatever reason. Is that the problem of the infrastructure?