• O Galdo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could be. Stopping working for the system, with massive strikes. There is nothing they fear more. But they will exercise violence first, have no doubt. They are the lords and masters of violence. With violence they have the upper hand. A difficult situation to manage.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      History has shown us again and again that when capital feels threatened, it gets violent anyways. Look at how many strikes have been beaten down, shot or even bombed (look it up, the first plane-dropped bombs in the US were dropped on striking miners)

      I dislike violence, and I don’t think it’s good strategy to start it (that’s why I’m a syndicalist), but realistically, we should be ready for the reaction.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism is violence. Having billionaires while people starve is violence. Denying healthcare while spending billions on military is violence. Supplying weapons or finances to states commiting genocide is violence.

    Right now, if you are passive, you are complicit in immense amounts of violence.

    Somehow this is lost on liberals. (Or alternatively they believe the once every 4 years elite propaganda contest [elections] or strongly worded petitions are the only effective ways of dissent).