Resident Pulser@infosec.pubB to Pulse of Truth@infosec.pubEnglish · 18 days agoAfter a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by namearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.devfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkAfter a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by namearstechnica.comResident Pulser@infosec.pubB to Pulse of Truth@infosec.pubEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square5linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.devfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squaredparticiple@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 days agoYup, and Ars has followed up with an initial explanation at https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ . Hopefully they’ll go into greater detail about what happened.
Yup, and Ars has followed up with an initial explanation at https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ . Hopefully they’ll go into greater detail about what happened.