LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoPositivitypiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square107linkfedilinkarrow-up1880arrow-down129
arrow-up1851arrow-down1imagePositivitypiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square107linkfedilink
minus-squarethedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoDefinitely not on the first one, the second one it is still the official stance of the United States that the bombs prevented what would have been an even bloodier and much more destructive ground assault.
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoWhich is lies, lol. Look at any legitimate contemporary historian for a source.
minus-squarethedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoNo that I’m calling you wrong, but you really need to back claims like that with a source better than “Google it”
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoI don’t work for the stupid.
minus-squarethedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoLol, you just brandish unsourced “facts”.
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoProve me wrong.
minus-squareSuper Mega Ultra Edition DX Unleashed 64@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoYou’re already wrong. Prove you’re right.
minus-squarethedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt it’s impossible to prove a negative. I can’t produce evidence of these claims not existing. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.
Definitely not on the first one, the second one it is still the official stance of the United States that the bombs prevented what would have been an even bloodier and much more destructive ground assault.
Which is lies, lol. Look at any legitimate contemporary historian for a source.
No that I’m calling you wrong, but you really need to back claims like that with a source better than “Google it”
I don’t work for the stupid.
Lol, you just brandish unsourced “facts”.
Prove me wrong.
You’re already wrong. Prove you’re right.
It it’s impossible to prove a negative. I can’t produce evidence of these claims not existing.
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.