The use of large language models (“LLMs”) has exploded in recent years, including in the generation of source code. But even as their usage gains popularit...
What creative transformation has that company done? It seems to me rather that the LLM is an entirely mechanical process with no creativity.
No more creative than what my ISP does when it conveys data from one machine to another.
We don’t allow the ISP to claim copyright in the data that it mechanically transforms. I don’t see why the company running an LLM would have any stronger claim of copyright in the output.
No, i don’t think so, i said “if so”. A piece of code can’t own something, unlike a person. Would be a different matter, if the piece of code was a person, but alas.
If so, the copyright of the slop would be by the company running the LLM.
What creative transformation has that company done? It seems to me rather that the LLM is an entirely mechanical process with no creativity.
No more creative than what my ISP does when it conveys data from one machine to another.
We don’t allow the ISP to claim copyright in the data that it mechanically transforms. I don’t see why the company running an LLM would have any stronger claim of copyright in the output.
So self hosted inference means you own it then?
No, i don’t think so, i said “if so”. A piece of code can’t own something, unlike a person. Would be a different matter, if the piece of code was a person, but alas.