The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agoNever let it connect, btw... no matter how nicely it asks.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square232linkfedilinkarrow-up1987arrow-down118
arrow-up1969arrow-down1imageNever let it connect, btw... no matter how nicely it asks.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square232linkfedilink
minus-squareArtemis_Mystique@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 month agoI truly despise that we stopped innovating on CRTs when flat panels came along.
minus-squareculprit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThere was some hype for nanotube display tech about 20 years ago that was closer to CRTs in picture quality and responsiveness. Unfortunately it seems like LCD/LED has won out over any other tech so far. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/motorola-builds-nanotube-based-display/
minus-squareSirLeToet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoCRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society. Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began. However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.
I truly despise that we stopped innovating on CRTs when flat panels came along.
There was some hype for nanotube display tech about 20 years ago that was closer to CRTs in picture quality and responsiveness. Unfortunately it seems like LCD/LED has won out over any other tech so far.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/motorola-builds-nanotube-based-display/
CRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society.
Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began.
However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.