Sorry, would you have preferred if I copy-pasted the link, so you could feel like your thoughts were unique? Also: An ad hominem isn’t just when you get insulted, dumbass
Sorry, but insulting you isn’t dismissing the argument. Dismissing the argument also isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem is when the character of the person making the argument is attacked as a way of attacking the argument. As I’ve already spelled out for you and you’re too stupid to understand: “You suck” is not an ad hominem. “You suck and therefore your argument sucks” is an ad hominem. “Your argument sucks” also isn’t an ad hominem, since you would’ve otherwise been called out for it ages ago.
Finally, I haven’t dismissed the argument, I have addressed it. You are just not the first one to make it, so I won’t rewrite the same argument to coddle your sensitivities. The only dismissing arguments here is you, since you are the one insistent on not engaging with the text given to you.
Anyways, learn what words mean and stop supporting fascists 😊
Wow! What a well-reasoned response! I will now write in Hilary Clinton.
You can’t reason someone out of a conclusion they didn’t arrive to by reasoning.
What a way to tell on yourself lmao. You’re in the circus going “Look at all these clowns!” Give your nose a squeak for me and tell me what you hear
Says the guy who claim to dismiss everything with a link
No, just everything you’ve said so far.
Yes, which you tried to dismiss with a link and now with ad hominems, zero reasoning.
Sorry, would you have preferred if I copy-pasted the link, so you could feel like your thoughts were unique? Also: An ad hominem isn’t just when you get insulted, dumbass
You are dismissing the argument by addressing the person instead of the claims, which you did. Textbook.
PS: if you feel the need to insult people online you might have anger issues, maybe touch some grass?
Sorry, but insulting you isn’t dismissing the argument. Dismissing the argument also isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem is when the character of the person making the argument is attacked as a way of attacking the argument. As I’ve already spelled out for you and you’re too stupid to understand: “You suck” is not an ad hominem. “You suck and therefore your argument sucks” is an ad hominem. “Your argument sucks” also isn’t an ad hominem, since you would’ve otherwise been called out for it ages ago.
Finally, I haven’t dismissed the argument, I have addressed it. You are just not the first one to make it, so I won’t rewrite the same argument to coddle your sensitivities. The only dismissing arguments here is you, since you are the one insistent on not engaging with the text given to you.
Anyways, learn what words mean and stop supporting fascists 😊