I’m anti-LLMs and generative AI both because it’s useless garbage and because of the disgusting social and environmental cost. Anyone who thinks it works incredibly is either using for shit that barely required a sapient person to begin with (writing office emails and making flyers), or they’re using it as the most expensive autocorrect in the world (coders). Shockingly, all of which can be done without destroying the planet and with fewer errors if you just pay actual people to do it. All of which is irrelevant to the fact that it simply does not to the things these companies are claiming it does. It is not going to replace your human work force, it is not going to recursively improve itself any more than breeding faster horses made trains.
Oh, sorry, I forgot it also works incredibly for spamming and hacking insecure systems. Vital needs worth destroying the planet over.
I’m anti-LLMs and generative AI both because it’s useless garbage and because of the disgusting social and environmental cost. Anyone who thinks it works incredibly is either using for shit that barely required a sapient person to begin with (writing office emails and making flyers), or they’re using it as the most expensive autocorrect in the world (coders). Shockingly, all of which can be done without destroying the planet and with fewer errors if you just pay actual people to do it. All of which is irrelevant to the fact that it simply does not to the things these companies are claiming it does. It is not going to replace your human work force, it is not going to recursively improve itself any more than breeding faster horses made trains.
Oh, sorry, I forgot it also works incredibly for spamming and hacking insecure systems. Vital needs worth destroying the planet over.
You literally contradicted yourself in your own comment.
You claim it’s useless autocomplete, then at the end suddenly remember that it’s capable of hacking stuff.