I’ve now thrown out all my toothbrushes and toilet paper. My fridge and pantry have been emptied entirely, and the bookshelf has been purged. Maybe this wasn’t the best approach.
Okay, so I’m getting rid of my mattress, most of my furniture, most of my electronics, etc.
I think the idea behind this idea is good: If you’re trying to get rid of stuff, only keep things that you would expend a bit of effort for.
However, I think they’re wildly underestimating how many items will be destroyed or irreversably ruined in some way by poop.
I think it’s probably better to amend it to, “if it was covered in poop would you get rid of it and not replace it?”
I’m too poor to replace the things that got covered, so this still doesn’t work.
Listen mate, if you can cover 50" tv in poop, you need to go see a doctor first.
They didn’t specify whose poop.
Guess I’m throwing out all of my underwear
“You will own nothing” ass philosophy
Would be a weird magazine if every story had to be a watergate level expose or it wouldn’t be printed
Would I still keep the Washington post if it were covered in poop…
It already is and no
Time to throw away all the food.
Ah yes, the Marie Kondo method
