• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I wasn’t old enough to be politically involved when Al Gore ran, but I heard he had good policies. How many people can tell you what policies Kamala ran on?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Harris ran on a continuation of existing beneficial politics with a trend of effectiveness and some tuning after she took over the post.

      In short, her position was

      ** gestures at 4 years of positive tending numbers **

      . Oh: and not fucking up the treason trial for Trump.

      But the sparkle junkies need everything to pop-pop-pop, so incremental improvement wasnt as good as destruction of America.

          • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            No argument, no talking points, no facts, no sources, just a biased opinion and a salty comment.

            That’s not criticism. That’s badmouthing.

            I’m tired of these people pointing at one candidate’s speck of dust, while ignoring the other candidate’s plank to justify not voting against a fascist dictator.

            She was pro fracking.

            Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn’t far left enough. And so, because of that one specific detail, that as enough to tip the balance and swing the vote for the guy who is not only very pro fracking, but also for destroying the entire ecosystem and environment scorched-earth style.

            I’m so f… tired of the double standard.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              I’m tired of these people pointing at one candidate’s speck of dust, while ignoring the other candidate’s plank to justify not voting against a fascist dictator.

              You assume that about anyone with any criticism whatsoever of harris.

              I voted for harris; you just can’t abide anything other than unconditional worship of her.

              Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn’t far left enough. And so, because of that one specific detail, that as enough to tip the balance and swing the vote for the guy who is not only very pro fracking, but also for destroying the entire ecosystem and environment scorched-earth style.

              And you’re doubling down on the bad faith assumption that criticism of harris is support for trump.

              • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                I wasn’t criticizing your comment. I never implied that you had voted for the other guy.

                And I have no worship for her. She’s a politician. I only had hope, for the country and for the world, that the other guy wouldn’t take power.

                She was pro fracking. Got to line those pockets afterall.

                A lot was implied in that comment the person wrote. Implying that she is corrupt.

                That isn’t criticism. That is badmouthing.

                And that is what I have a problem with. The double standard, and the gratuitous smearing. That’s what revolts me. That’s what upsets me.