• SilverShark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t quite get why massive Gnome changes would imply a death of Desktop Linux. There are so many great alternatives to it. It’s been many years that Gnome has been considered bad by many, and that many have used alternatives. I just think it’s positive that Gnome continue to get worse, because like that more distros may default to better alternatives to begin with.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hated Gnome 3 when it came out, but it got better over the years. If you want to use it as a traditional KDE-style DE, you’re going to fight it and have a bad time. If you use it as intended, and that works for you, it’s good.

      • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kde is not traditional. It looks like disgusting microshit garbage. Same as cinnamon.

        I don’t know why people would want to sue desktop environments that like that like garbage product made by billy gats