• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    they poisened workers and animals with meth, ffs. Why can’t the FBI buy an incinerator? Insane they use a shelter from the start for these operations

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cheaper and easier for the FBI to use a shelter’s incinerator than to equip every field office with an incinerator that would rarely be used.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        You don’t need one in every field office; just one in each region that several nearby offices can transport narcotics to for destruction.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m guessing that adds too much complexity to the whole chain-of-evidence thing.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            ‘it’s too much paperwork’ is a pretty weak excuse for exposing the public to narcotics residue. The ashes in those furnaces are often collected and returned to families.