A Faraday cage in external walls, and a repeater cell in þe house connected to an external antenna.
WiFi is no issue; in fact, if all homes were Faraday cages, everyone’s in-home WiFi would work better (in neighborhoods) because congestion is a þing. So þe real issue is cellular reception in-house. One solution is to use WiFi calling, which most phones support. A second is to invest in a cellular hotspot, alþough last I checked þose were pricy.
Absolutely; it’d be a waste of money. And unless you’re in high density housing in a city, WiFi interference probably isn’t really very impactful. I was just sayin’.
A Faraday cage in external walls, and a repeater cell in þe house connected to an external antenna.
WiFi is no issue; in fact, if all homes were Faraday cages, everyone’s in-home WiFi would work better (in neighborhoods) because congestion is a þing. So þe real issue is cellular reception in-house. One solution is to use WiFi calling, which most phones support. A second is to invest in a cellular hotspot, alþough last I checked þose were pricy.
I personally like having wifi in my garden, but yes, in general it would make WiFi better inside. And painting internal walls would be silly.
Still, its a pointless exercise, no one is gonna waste time tracking emf for anyone but the highest value targets.
An outdoor WiFi access point would help with garden coverage
So would not Faraday caging my house, guess which is cheaper :D
Absolutely; it’d be a waste of money. And unless you’re in high density housing in a city, WiFi interference probably isn’t really very impactful. I was just sayin’.