Jason Bassler | @JasonBassler1

Big Brother just got an upgrade.

Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored, tagged, & analyzed without consent.

One step closer to total surveillance.

[Image: A Ring doorbell camera mounted on a brick wall. A digital overlay shows facial recognition scanning a person's face with grid lines. Text on the right reads “Amazon's Ring Adds Facial Recognition to Home Security” with additional text below.]

6:00 PM | Oct 4, 2025

Source: https://x.com/JasonBassler1/status/1974640686419857516

  • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Same here. All private cameras that record or process data from a public space need to be announced on entrance of a property. Though now that i think about it, idk how ring got passed that law to begin with in 99% of its use cases…

    ( if its a front door that can only view private property its fine iirc, and if it has public space like roads its a nono )

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Same as non-legal ebikes perhaps? Where I live the police don’t seem to care unless the rider happens to be a drug dealer or otherwise wanted by the police.

      I’d take a guess that while a ring doorbell might be illegal and not enforced, it probably means the recorded footage might be not accepted in court if ever needed… Perhaps (I’m not a lawyer or even close to being an expert). Unless a doorbell inspector becomes a thing then it probably just slides.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      idk how ring got passed that law to begin with in 99% of its use cases

      It doesn’t comply… but the responsibility falls on the person who mounts/uses the hardware, so Amazon does whatever they want.