no pero si si embarazado

albumoftheyear (a newer site like rateyourmusic) and last.fm and youtube

Implementation is a huge part but not the major part. Figuring out bugs is a part of design, and implementation probably seems to take more time because one hasn’t thought about the design and designs it on-the-fly, which is what we often do. Figuring out APIs does also take time but not nearly as much as all the design in engineering.

I don’t think anything in the post applies to using AI to figure out syntax.

Jobs like coding now look more like architectural design jobs rather than typing jobs.

I don’t think you’re a programmer. The major part of programming has always been design, not syntax.

I’m not sure if you’ve even read the post. The entire point of this thread is that AI shouldn’t be replacing thinking, that it shouldn’t replace the architectural design, creativity, or the generation of original ideas, which people are using it for. Photos did not replace framing and composition, while limiting stroke style but giving the benefit of authenticity (which I admit was short-lived) and speed. AI gives the benefit of speed while heavily compromising the creativity and reliability of its output and should not substitute the ability to think for yourself. Not that you can’t use it for clerical tasks.

That’s a confusing way to describe it which also seems to have no impact on this discussion. IQ is standardized each year or so to always average at 100. You’re probably referring to people in the 21st century getting lower scores on older tests, which is called the “reverse Flynn effect”. And it’s called the reverse Flynn effect for a reason: this is a new observation only in the 21st century, while the Flynn effect—where people scored higher on older tests—was observed for a much longer time throughout the 20th century, which saw a ton of innovation as well; in the USA, most notably the societal upheaval into suburbanism and consumerism among other things. And even the reverse Flynn effect so far has been observed independently and before AI, before the prospect of the replacement of thinking.

I think the argument remains intact if you just s/thinking/cogitation. The argument is that it can replace cogitation and shouldn’t, not that it shouldn’t be used at all. Plus it’s non-deterministic unlike the other tools.

it’s not even taut, it’s somehow just “floating around” and slicing the neck every single time

Okay that is a problem with my instance; @melroy’s set it to private or something for some reason. have a l*mmy link:

https://p.lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/lemmy.dbzer0.com/49614616

i just posted an nyt article touching on this lmao

https://kbin.melroy.org/m/interestingshare@lemmy.zip/t/1077080/Article-Sharing-a-Bed-With-Your-Kid-It-s-Totally-Normal

Cool, that can happen independently of amending the Speaker-ing procedure.

as a master in parts of speech from the holy aatubey school of hypercorrection i demand you gerundify “gaslight” into “gaslighting”

Not the norm, but not unexpected at all either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Brackett_Reed#Spanish-American_War_and_resignation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_House_of_Representatives_sit-in#June_23:_Sit-in_ends

oh dear b-but that’ll ruin my laconism

What’s the holistic view, then?

We don’t pay these people, they do.

What’s your alternative to having the representatives elect one member to exclude from debates and decide when to recess?

I don’t see why it isn’t. This is the norm everywhere else. For a slightly extreme example, Prime Ministers can do the same thing. You have to have someone decide when to recess. If representatives disagree, they just vacate 'em. To counterbalance, the Speaker does not usually participate in floor debates, and is mostly responsible for other procedural and administrative stuff as well.

personally i think johnson looks like an adorable teddy bear

with a dark underside

Why can’t he do this? He was elected Speaker of the House.

i think it’s more like saying a black person can use the Hard R