Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]

I mean, I’m aromantic and have a partner. It’s not like I don’t love them, I do, intensely. I simply don’t understand what the difference is between romantic and platonic love.

Like, what’s different about the love you have for a romantic partner than the love you have for a friend? Is it simply the addition of being sexually attracted to someone? So romantic love is friendship plus sexual attraction? What happens when the sexual attraction fades? Do you stop romantically loving your partner? Do you then break up because you’re no longer sexually attracted to them? I just don’t get it, frankly.

Sexual attraction for me is so, so fickle, it comes and goes and never stays. If I tried to build partner relationships on sexual attraction, well, I’d never stick with one partner for long, I’d be breaking up with people constantly, and that sounds like a miserable way to live. Especially since I’ve found a person I get along great with, we have similar long-term goals, senses of humor that mesh great, they’re everything I want in a life partner. I really don’t think it’s unreasonable for me to be married to this person, we’ve built our life together, why would I throw that away just because I don’t really “get” romantic love?

Back in topic, would you be that negative if AI’s issues were addressed and solved? Because they will be addressed and solved. It’s a basic business need to minimise costs (energy, water) and solve legal disputes (copyright).

The issues with LLMs will never be solved. The environmental damage and copyright issues will persist as long as capitalism does. And those aren’t even my main issues. These fucking things are marketed as thinking machines that can reason and help people work through problems, but they are fundamentally incapable of that. They hallucinate and spout nonsense and it’s not a matter of “oh, just train them better, they’ll eventually be worth using”, there are fundamental mathematical reasons that these things spout so much nonsense, and no amount of high quality training data will ever fix it.

So you think that the lack of disgust over cell phones (or smartphones, I’m happy to talk about them instead, since that’s what you meant) had more to do with the lack of social media than anything inherent in the technology. I don’t know that I agree, really. It’s possible, I suppose, but I don’t really use social media now (except posting on Hexbear), and I would say my disgust with LLMs has more to do with my understanding of the mathematics behind them and my experiences using them, rather than listening to what other people are saying about them.

At this rate of adoption, in a few years it will be as normal as having a mobile phone (they weren’t around only 20 years ago)

First, mobile phones were extremely common in 2005 (20 years ago), even I had one, and I was literally a child.

Second, and this is the part I’m actually curious about: I wonder if there were people in the 80s and 90s (when mobile phones were actually rare, but becoming more common) who felt the same pure, visceral disgust for them that I feel for LLMs. I sort of suspect not, but I could be wrong, and I’d be curious to read anti-cell phone writing from that era, to see what people were worried about and whether those worries are in any way the same as the current worries I (and many others) have about LLMs.

Ok, well, enjoy the results of your very obvious bait post I guess.

I find it extremely shitty for someone to actively pick a fight and then whine about how they didn’t actually want a fight, but you do you.

Mate, I just posted a meme in our own comm

Are you fucking serious? Remind me again what the first comment posted in this thread was? Was it you saying:

I expect some spicy takes in the comments soon…

Yes, yes it was, you disengenuous fuck. I’m beginning to agree with the people saying you have a humiliation fetish, I don’t know why else you’d decide to make this post.