That’s what you think, but as soon as I leave this comment thread and become unaware of it, I’m sorry to say, but you will stop existing. Tough luck.

deleted by creator

Yeah the problem is not the browser, it’s that websites are so big. Firefox works perfectly fine on low bandwidth if you use ublock origin and block media and script loading.

I use this often for the same reason, many websites don’t display properly or at all anymore but at least it’s more usable.

I’ve driven my car until it shows 1km and then 0km expected distance, and then a few kilometers more.

Yes but that is also a rationalization after the fact. First, it was ew, then we figured out that there were also rational reasons against it.

Kein scheiß, in dem Fall sollte genau das passieren. Es gibt so ein paar Sachen, wo die, die darüber entscheiden, die Effekte der Entscheidung spüren müssen, und das wäre so eins wo das der Fall ist.

So you’re saying bloated fruit cans are the ones to look for? Got it, thanks!

Dude, it’s ok to be wrong sometimes, no one would judge you :) In fact, it’s a sign of strength to be able to admit you’re wrong, and people will like you more for it. It’ll also be good for you personally as you will be more effective in more things :)

my default mode of thinking assumes that I am the best at everything

Well then you are not quite with me though, I’m not even remotely the best at most things, and I know that. Everyone is pretty terrible at the things they haven’t practiced, and I haven’t spent a significant amount of practice with most things.

But to me, it is not important in the evaluation of how good I am in total that I’m good at many things. Everyone has different things that they are good at. Rather, for example, my ability to accurately assess my skills in different areas is one of the things what makes me actually good, i.e. not overestimating myself in things I’m terrible at, and not underestimating myself in things I’m actually good at. I think that is a skill everyone should be good at.

Obviously, this whole evaluation includes a plethora of factors, and this is just one of them. Truly getting into why I think I’m probably one of the best humans around would take too long for such a casual thread, and is likely not even close to being desired information for anyone.

And it’s not even guaranteed that my evaluation is any good, and anyway, everybody’s evaluation is different. I do not actually know if the criteria by which I judge myself and others are good right now, it’s very possible they change in the future once I know more. Other people’s set of criteria might be better than mine. As such, I don’t actually presume to tell anyone what I think of them unless they specifically want to know.

I’m not at any specific “mode” and I do think my way of thinking about myself is very healthy.

Very good, I think I’m probably one of the best humans on Earth, yet I still am far from perfect and have so many places where I can do better.

deleted by creator

Maybe we just need to market it as the first step for viable railguns

It does. I’ve been using it as my secrettool for quite a while instead of kwallet in KDE kwin wayland.

Yeah making this into a man vs woman thing is stupid, I took the original post just as a person saying “people can have different kinds of intelligence, everything should be respected”

Your issues with programming don’t really seem related to programming, more of personal ones. Like for example, if you “don’t have the time for debugging anymore”, why would you have the time to figure out why your clay pot you made came out crooked?

I personally look around what the landscape looks like now and 20 years ago when I started it, and honestly, I can’t see thaaat much different for programming by yourself. Most changes occured in the interaction part of it, not quite knowing if you’re speaking with a human or a LLM. But research and learning still works the same way, maybe a bit more noise, but that had to be filtered out before as well, there was already so much stupidity 20 years ago.

Why is it worth it to risk hallucinations when you can just get information from where the LLM gets its information from?

You have no idea what is actually true. All of what you said could later turn out to be false, once we learn more about the universe. So while this is a fun speculation based on current knowledge, it may effectively be completely useless in the future. And right now, it doesn’t even give any actionable arguments for anything.

Instead of letting the large language model think for you, I would suggest to try critical thinking for yourself. I sincerely mean this in a kind way, because if you continue with this, you may become a drone like the ones we talk about here, and I wish that on nobody. I know this current path is easier/more convenient, but sometimes one has to choose the harder path to arrive at a better result.

That’s what happens when you don’t actually understand the change and just listen to whoever is posting it. The disingenuous thing about LLMs is that they present their hallucinations with full confidence in a charismatic way. No matter the source, that is how anyone can mislead other humans, we’re just so extremely susceptible to it.

That’s what they’re saying:

When deployed, the soldier is launched into a designated hunt-zone. He navigates purely via visual landmarks. His brain constantly screens the nerve data from his eyes. When an object matches its classification matrix (e.g., a specific mobile missile launcher), the organism locks onto the pixel coordinate, arms the ESAD, and executes a terminal dive completely dependent on human input.