Not wrong but you skipped the other 49

I agree that calling something false is no better than true when it isn’t proven

I don’t think attacking the writer makes your best argument. Can you address the points in the article instead?

I think the article is trying to say that things “we can’t conclude from not enough evidence” are not science and therefore should not be part of a medical discussion until they are backed by science.

The article also points out that that using the appearance of science when it is not so, and the spinning of science was not accidental.

If paywalled: http://archive.today/ucJ0L

Rewrite: “Russia expands target surface for Ukraine”

Isreal and Iran saw how much Putin respected a Trump ceasefire

Fuck Immigration Fuck your MAGA