By tourists?

That sounds like you think “the third world” is some group that collectively decides on the same thing. But at the same time you haven’t given them any agency otherwise they would ban tourists from entering.

Maximum payload is 1.5t but the fuel payload is 12t so 3t of cocaine barely scratches it

I thought the reference point was the top of the head not the back

No because when you look left your head doesn’t tilt right. When you look up your head tilts backwards

I mean that’s literally the point the image is trying to make. The last sentence says the point is outside the sun for Jupiter.

I don’t think nitpicking the title achieves anything and it’s not even misleading unless it’s only taken in isolation.

I love that band

No part, thats why I said hypothetical. But it’s the only way to make sense of the claim that volume Vs mass is an issue.

Hopefully we’re not imagining halving the bounding box around the giraffe including the air

It kind of does if you half the volume. If you end up with the hypothetical gas filled half of a giraffe then it’s less mass than if you end up with the meat filled half.

Unless you were only trying to convey volume to begin with then yes it doesn’t make a difference.

Surely a giraffe is nearly uniform density making the distinction between volume and mass irrelevant

Of course

Exactly, and pretty much everyone knows this. Which is why them putting effort into preventing it is stupid

It’s a general complaint, not one website.

For the zoom issue, social media type ones. Not sure if it’s Reddit or Imgur. The frames and text content gets larger but the image stays the same size.

For the right click hijack, usually photography and stock sites

Didn’t know that, but those download protection things also have other tricks like a transparent image placed over the top.

And their stupid website prevents you from zooming in on the image. Or they disabled right click on it in an attempt to stop you from saving the image. It really is pathetic

But it wouldn’t be like that though would it. It would be public group.members() and the u8 would be private.

If all the millions of groups are saved on a central database then making the size a u8 isn’t really that weird