But also, you can use it if you want.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
I read all 3. Loved them!
Interesting ideas 💡
Fun sci fi settings
Characters were predictable
Nice mix of science and fiction
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
1·4 months agoWhat is it means men get systematically treated better so we need to put our finger on the scale?
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
3·4 months agoUnless the government subsidizes their wages or reduces tax burdens for companies that have more diverse hiring
That’s what we do in my country. If you hire only men you generally qualify for fewer government programs. In some cases you cant bid on the job if you don’t have sufficient representation for specific groups.
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
3·4 months agoYou have a very developed viewpoint! Thank you for sharing it!
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
25·4 months agoThen according to commentators in this post you’re a “sexist pig”
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Are you a feminist? (If so why, if not why not?)
41·4 months agoI believe that I am, but I’m told that my definition is wrong.
For reference, my definition is:
Anybody who believes in equal rights for women.
BillyTheKid@lemmy.cato
Open Source@lemmy.ml•"I support it only if it's open source" should be a more common viewpoint
121·4 months agoLike backdoors, Lax security, technical debt, etc
BillyTheKid@lemmy.catoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Mark my words: they will put Kamala 2.0. or Gavin in the race for president instead of AOC or any other progressive.
0·8 months agoThe democrats are objectively better for the majority of the population. Science has a liberal bias and all that.
What many of the dem leaders and commentors are missing is that’s not enough. Blaming and shaming people online, even if you’re right which as I covered you objectively are, isn’t going to win the election. A lot of people voted for Trump because they feel left out and unheard. Maybe they should be, after all some of them hold dangerous ideas like climate change denial or think giving underrepresented people’s a chance is unfair.
But that’s just not enough. Being right isn’t enough. Pointing out their idiocy only serves to entrench them and scare away moderates. You might say, not voting means they’re dumb, right or wrong that comment doesn’t help your cause. Being objectively correct didn’t win the last election. Until the democrats acknowledge that optics are more import than correctness they’re going to fight an uphill battle. A very steep one.


People always call me crazy but I buy commercial displays. You can get them cheaper if you do it the right way. So speakers, no tuner, no smart functions, usually only 1 or 2 inputs, and basically no bells or whistles.
But that’s how I like it, so I don’t care if it makes me 🤣😧🤣😧