Apples and rice in the US were found to be contaminated with arsenic from the soil. Farms are moved, soil is treated, processing is changed.
Here what can be done for Chocolate:
Some brands of chocolate do not have high lead. It’s not a necessary part of chocolate production.
It’s not as safe as other chocolates that have significantly less lead and cadmium. Furthermore, in some cases the contamination comes from the processing machinery, not the soil, so it completely under their control to immediately eliminate it. Yet they didn’t say they planned to address the problem. They could also begin the process of eliminating cadmium by replanting on uncontaminated soil.
https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-safety/lead-and-cadmium-in-dark-chocolate-a8480295550/
Annoyingly, instead of saying they were going to address the problem, Tony’s response was “it’s in the soil” and CR used “California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)” standards. Which ignores that their chocolate is still higher in lead than some other brands.
https://tonyschocolonely.com/blogs/other/a-small-update-on-health-and-safety-and-heavy-metals
I think he’s saying we need a fuckstairs forum.
I was all about Tony’s until it came out it’s high in lead and cadmium. Ghirardelli is the only easy to buy brand for me that isn’t high in lead or cadmium.
I didn’t remember that one and it turns out it was from a new version done in 2016.
I don’t understand the wild eyed hate for a spell checker on steroids. LLMs predict the next word like the phone keyboard you use every day.
Hate the hype, not the tool.
The sole purpose of all tools ever created is to lower the value of human skills.
LLM’s are hyped but have some value as a tool.
I think I’ve seen a YouTuber who made an AI robot that could do that.
In a competitive market, there would be no reason to invest hundreds of billions of dollars into LLMs which are unprofitable, inaccurate, and have very limited use cases.
That’s not how capitalism works at all. Companies are spending money on AI because they need to compete against other companies. You might not like it for all the very good reasons you gave, but consumers are using AI so companies are trying to provide it. In the absence of competition, companies do not spend money chasing risky new revenue streams but milk their existing base.
If there was only Microsoft, and no other software company on the planet, Microsoft would not spend money on AI because they wouldn’t need to.
A big part of Marx’s criticism of capitalism is the waste it creates through duplication of effort.
If there were more Google/FB/Amazons there would be even more hardware purchases because there would be more companies competing to dominate AI.
previous gen
That’s not current gen.
That is a fundamentally incorrect interpretation of what a director does.
Then explain where my analogy fails.
Ultimately, due to how subjective the idea of art is there’s nothing I can say to convince you that this perspective is wrong.
You can change my mind by explaining how a director is different than what I’ve seen in hundreds of behind the scenes commentaries and documentaries on movie creation. To be more specific, some directors are also writers, storyboarders or cinematographers. But those are additional jobs that not all directors do.
because it’s so incorrect,
You need to explain why it is incorrect.
If they got broken up years ago
The problem is how do you break up a design team? My experience in hardware industry is that its a very tiny team of people making doing the silicon design and then hundreds/thousands of support engineers doing support hardware (like board layout that the chips will go on), software drivers and testing.
How could Nvidia be broken up? It’s the same GPU silicon being sold for gaming and AI. Gaming doesn’t even matter to them so if you broke out gaming into a separate company, they’d still be a monopoly.
Imo, it wouldn’t be a problem if they were taxed. The value they generate would go back to the people.
ai generated art didn’t create itself. someone typed in text and uploaded an image that they wanted manipulated. Movie directors only give instructions to actors. They don’t create the sets/costumes. They don’t write the words. They only give instructions and they get awards for being artists.
Wow! That’s a fantastic price!
A workhorse is: take my money and shut up
It doesn’t have to be one or the other! It can and does work out of the box without being a proprietary ecosystem. It’s not just Anycubic. You can use a Prusa, Flashforge, Qidi, etc as a workhorse without a proprietary ecosystem.
According to their beliefs, those who never heard of Jesus go to heaven as innocents like babies. So by spreading the word they are intentionally damnit most to Hell. Especially given that they believe only 144,000 get to go to heaven.
The Anycubic has presets for .4 and .6 in brass or hardened steel. It’s only missing .2.
I couldn’t care less. Drying is done in an oven.
You can’t claim the S1 is incomplete for not having a .2 nozzle presets and then turn around and say that a built in filament dryer doesn’t matter when Bambu made it a pro feature. Especially when .4 is what you get out of the box from Bambu and .2 requires modifying your printer by swapping the hot end.
Bought the P1S combo (AMS 1) for 636
Where? I see 800€ everywhere.
And where I “go after” Bambu is what you didn’t mention: locked down firmware and no alternative slicer.
I misunderstood. I thought the community title meant you are VERY attracted to cars.