No has said it because it’s not true.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 11th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.deto Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Those are rookie numbersEnglish1·22 days agoMy favorite version of this proof:
Let S be the subset of natural numbers that are not interesting. Suppose by way of contradiction that S is inhabited. Then by the well ordering principle of natural numbers, there is a least such element, s in S. In virtue of being the least non interesting number, s is in fact interesting. Hence s is not in S. Since s is in S and not in S, we have derived a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that S is inhabited must be false. Thus S is empty and there are no non interesting numbers.
Taught should be replaced with trough.