I just checked and I have 249 tabs open on my laptop. I have a problem. 🥲

Yeah… I’m not sure that’s a good monetization model… I feel like even the standard taking a small cut of every transaction is a better idea than that :/

It feels really overly punishing for small artists while being very reasonable for established larger artists, which sucks

A truely shameful number. More than you could possibly imagine. 🥲

Not autism but ADHD and social anxiety and I struggle with this so much 🥲

I’ve gotten a lot better with it though :)

Rippp

Fuck yeah 😊

I’m glad it was a great time!

I saw this on Mastodon and saved it for later, thank you for posting it here so I didn’t forget it

This is was a really lovely read.

Aw hell yeah! I just saw they were gonna be at open sauce, was that this weekend?

These designs for a sticker and magnet are also cool as hell. The digital garden design is really lovely

https://shop.eff.org/products/digital-garden-sticker-and-privacy-pro-magnet

Yeah I’d like to buy a couple things from their shop to support them, I just don’t have any money for things other than strict necessities right now

When I have a job I’d like to pick up some of their stickers and a magnet for my car. I’d say a hat too since their hat looks really nice, but I just mended a hat I’m really happy with so I don’t have need for another

Eventually I’d love to make ongoing donations, it’s just not in the cards for today

I didn’t realize that, I would have assumed gifs, being a simpler format, would be smaller

Thank you for teaching me something! 😊

This made me cackle, thank you

Gay :)

I’m sad they didn’t commit to illustrating the underlighting on the one with the flashlight, but I understand why lol

North Carolina here, there’s definitely been a fuckton of rain thusfar, and humidity to go with it

>:((((

3 buns and an armadillo!!! 🥹

🫂

Huh… Thanks for sharing your perspective! it sounds like I was wrong

The legislation “places them in the position of either complying with the requirements of their faith or violating the law. The consequences for violating the law are serious and, as Plaintiffs assert, the implications of violating the Sacramental Seal are more serious still,” he wrote.

Attorney General Nick Brown’s office emphasized that the ruling only applies to “the Sacrament of Confession” and that, if clergy learn about abuse in any other setting, the injunction does not change that they will be mandated reporters. Brown did not provide any further comment.

Batshit insane first paragraph. The second is at least some small positive. I don’t know that this being overturned actually makes any meaningful difference in practice though though- if people can’t say they abused a child in confessional they won’t. I guess you might catch some people in the transmission, who didn’t learn about the change? That would be a positive. But I think long term people just wouldn’t confess to sexual abuses in the confessional anymore