• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 15th, 2025

help-circle

  • I just tested it on my instance. You can create a public share by setting the mode to “Write”, which is accessible without logging in as a user (but with optional password).

    It works, but one does not see any files, not even the ones you uploaded yourself. So for example if you updated the file and need to re-upload it, there is no way for you to delete the previous one.

    You can also create a shared “virtual folder” that is seen by multiple users, and then you have fine grained control on a user basis (Users > burgermenu > edit > ACLs > Per directory permissions) there you can mix and match from a list of ~15 permissions. To upload anything to that virtual folder, you’ll have to properly log in as a user.

    Hope either one of the ways works for you. Cheers



  • HelloRoot@lemy.loltoOpen Source@lemmy.mlChameleon vs JShelter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t know the details, but from just trying out both jShelter worked better for me.

    When a website didn’t work, I know to toggle the toggles one by one until it works. With chameleon, I have tried clicking around through it’s 7 tabs and 20 options, but failed to make the websites work. It also wasn’t clear what it does with the useragent and such, as creepjs was still able to detect everything.

    So yeah, I recommend to try creepjs with either one and see what changes. Then you know which the better one is for privacy. And if it’s neither, then you know that js is really fucking creepy, because it can use a lot of tricky ways to figure out stuff about your browser and os. The only way is to fully block js.