Hard to knock him for this one, who the hell CAN stay awake listening to Dr. Oz?

To an extent, yes. “Video streaming giant Netflix” would suffice.

Three different articles I’ve seen about this and not ONE of them even ATTEMPTS to explain what Blackstone is.

Yes, I could, and did, google it, but it’s infuriating, on principle. It’s a bsic reading comprehension concept: don’t assume your reader knows outside context, when your audience is essentially random.

you write it in a special programming language, which is basically English, which describes how you want to see this application in a very specified way

A derivative of English, with different syntax and rules to help eliminate ambiguities? We in the industry tend to call that “code”.

I mean… I don’t see the comic portraying the idea as good. More just using it as a vehicle to call most people dumb.

Both based on books by the same dude! Something I didn’t realize for quite some. I need to go read his shit.

Gone in Sixty Seconds.

Moneyball.

Addendum: Kung Fu Panda

They should be fucking arrested for wasting Wagyu beef in a chili.

I mean, that’s how it used to be when I was growing up.

The fact that “how it used to be” in your childhood produced a scumbag like you is a compelling argument to not let people’s childhoods be like that anymore.

I think you’re very pretty - especially naked.

Something I’ve learned about compliments, in general, is to be specific. Like, even outside of the nudity, just “I think you’re very pretty” is rather a poor compliment. Leaving it open-ended like that plays into what others have said in this thread, that it can be interpreted negatively.

In this case, the obvious alternative in my mind is “I really like your tattoos.” That even opens up the opportunity for a conversation about how she got them and what they mean to her. You could could also complement her hair, as you mentioned you appreciated that as well.

asked her if she’d allow me to explain my obvious fuck-up

This is a very natural reaction on your part, and comes from a good place: you’ve recognized that you’ve caused someone pain/harm, and want to help alleviate it. Unfortunately, when it comes to topics where sexuality is involved, I don’t think there’s any scenario where it helps. Not unless they come to you seeking an apology/explanation. The most helpful thing for most people, in this scenario, is to have a little contact as possible with the person who made them uncomfortable. Even if you’re being genuine about this, most people aren’t.

I tried to explain to X again that I wasn’t sexualising her in any way

I think this is especially not going to help, because it’s not an apology. A real, genuine apology for a situation like this involves you recognizing that you did, in fact, do wrong to someone (which, again, in this case, I think you do recognize), so an apology HAS to focus on that.

For me, a true apology has to consist of 3 things:

• Contrition (I.E. “I’m sorry”)
• Understanding (what you did that was wrong, and how it was wrong)
• Amends (what/how you’re going to do better in the future)

Focusing on explaining your side of the story screws up the “understanding” part. It makes it about what SHE did wrong (“you reacted without knowing the full story”) instead of what YOU did wrong (“I didn’t consider that my words would make you uncomfortable”). Alternatively, it’s “you shouldn’t be feeling this way, because you don’t know the whole story” instead of “I shouldn’t have made you feel this way”. Even though that’s not what you meant to say, that’s an entirely understandable way to interpret it.

Explaining your side of the story can still be part of this, but it comes under the “Amends” category. I.E. “I wasn’t trying to sexualize you, so I need to work on avoiding sexualizing language” or “I need to work on choosing my words more carefully, I should be able to compliment someone without it coming off as a sexual thing.”

Anyway, that’s just my 2 cents. If everything you’ve told us is accurate, I think you’re genuinely a fine person, and you just need to file this one away as a learning experience, the best you can. Nothing more to be done about it now.

What’d you have for dinner?

A) And yet, not long after, Andor was massively successful.

B) Then stop making games exclusively based off of third party IPs.

Seems like a jab at CBS prioritizing those kinds of shows over the largely-more-popular Late Show. Alternatively, maybe making a jab at those being the best that CBS has to offer.

These days, mostly for reddit mirror bots.

I dunno what people’s obsession is with Lululemon, and I really don’t care, but that fucking bot alone is like 5% of lemmy/all, these days.

This appears to be a rare proper use of machine-learning tech.

No, they did not ask ChatGPT to whip them up a concrete mix. They (in co-operation with engineers) trained a mathematical model specifically for the task of predicting the performance of concrete mixes, in order to narrow down the number of mixes to do (time-intensive) real-world testing on. With a focus on also predicting the carbon-emission impact of the mixes.

This is the kind of technology we need more of. Not LLM slop.

Add a submission fee that gets refunded as part of the bounty payout, or if the reviewer otherwise judges the submission as obviously legitimate.

Donate all fee proceeds to charity, if you want to counter the any incentive to deny submissions for financial gain.

Yup.

I’m not really sure that being open source here means much of anything, but an SO alternative definitely sounds good. Thanks for the tip.

Use of AI (actually Machine Learning) in the medical field has been going on for a LONG time, and has nothing to do with the recent explosion of mostly-useless LLMs. And even if this weren’t the case, the way some technology was developed kinda doesn’t matter a whole lot when it’s going to be put through a rigorous testing process to determine it’s actual efficacy. Which is what this article is talking about: taking a drug that’s already gone through a bunch of non-human testing and moving to the next step.

I know the US government is doing its damndest to dismantle safety regulations, avross all industries, but I don’t think we’re quite at the point that we should be alarmed at new possible cancer treatments.

I read it to mean that this method has confirmed “almost no real person has spoken to me”.