Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2024

help-circle

  • Personally I don’t think the feature consolidation was the problem. It IS still nice to have my music library, a camera, and a fairly capable computer all able to fit in my pocket…

    The problem is we consolidated around specific device makers, letting them get too big and too comfortable - we’ve gone from being customers to being money chattle.



  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.iotomemes@lemmy.worldThe long game
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Valve could’ve legitimately done nothing and still be winning in comparison to the big three, but instead they’ve slowly and steadily been helping the gaming community to give Windows the middle finger by making huge contributions to Linux gaming.

    Honestly, its downright shameful how many companies have forgotten that a good way to make money from customers is simply to treat them nicely while they’re buying your goods.




  • Yeah, its ironic. The richest man in the world doesn’t have a single* truly profit-making venture under him.

    How the bubble around him hasn’t burst yet I don’t know, but it would certainly be a feast for sore eyes.

    *Edit: Forgot about SpaceX, which actually has made itself a decent chunk of money - about $15.5 billion in 2025 - but I doubt that alone is capable of propping up his nearly $500 billion personal valuation.






  • Fair enough. I imagine as a PhD its easier to avoid since you’re doing new research, so you’re presenting unique information with (in theory) unique sentences.

    Whereas for a lot of undergrad students, up until the tail end of their degrees, they’re writing about fairly extensively covered topics, so you’re much more likely to accidentally steal wordings from others who have already written about them. In fact at that stage, I’d bet having too low a plagiarism score would more likely indicate you’re barking up the wrong tree.


  • Genuinely. As a student I don’t think I ever saw a Turnitin score for my work below 40%. There are only so many ways to wrute a sentence about the same thing, so its impossible to not accidentally plagiarise someone’s works.

    I remember one lecturer telling me that they don’t really look at the % unless its something aggregious like +70%. But more often they’re looking for patterns in what it highlights.

    Loads of tiny highlights with individual sources are likely to be a false positive, but big chunks of highlights from only a couple of sources is likely to be a true positive.