

Either I missed it or they added it.
Either I missed it or they added it.
You’re off by 3 orders of magnitude…
Retracted.
I’m not CS smart enough to understand this… 😢
Plrase please please do this
I would usually agree with this kind of normalization, but in this case I actually think it would actually obfuscate the picture. Safer roads are a good thing, but if traffic deaths are reduced because more people bike or take the train, that’s still a win. Roads and cars are inherently dangerous, and that danger needs to be minimized using multiple strategies. We need to focus on holistic changes that consider people’s behaviour and their interactions with the built environment.
When people feel they absolutely need to drive, that’s a failure of infrastructure.
Don’t try to change their mind, but rather, ask them why they believe that. Talk about their reasoning for holding that position. Point it out gently when their reasons don’t make sense. Ask them “if details were different, would you still believe what you believe?” Ask them what they would need to see to change their mind.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?
all your base are belong to us
I suppose we’re about to find out if these things (LLMs) are any good at extrapolation. I expect not really as they’re effectively just interpolation machines.