let me know when you figure out which semantic argument I’m going to be ignoring

I never said anything about “most of”.

I said it’s not 75% because the other user claimed it is. it’s not semantics.

you’re doing great

I’m not the one making an unprovable claim

you can’t prove they are not sentient

75% isn’t semantics. it’s a statistic.

it’s not 75% of their lives, either. they’re not able to breed when they’re calves.

I didn’t care for your semantic interrogation. it’s obvious the user was exaggerating for effect.

you seem to understand exactly what was exaggerated

they have to keep a cow pregnant constantly to produce milk

exaggeration doesn’t help your credibility

itt: people justifying why their institution of mass murder is actually good

all they gotta do is block me and it won’t matter if I comment. I’m not there one who has problems with others being wrong on the Internet. it’s them who should do the blocking.

it was quieter. it was easier to avoid distractions.

oh, I understand the secondary effect, but what they asked won’t clean their feed

I don’t think you know how blocks work. if they block me, they can’t see me: their feed is clean. if I block them, they still see me. have you read any of the release notes?

where is that block?

liberals are handing out blocks now? can I get one?

another user said it’s like how christians call non-believers sinners. that makes sense to me.