I said good things about China again didn’t I and that made you insecure or mad so you checked my profile.

  • 0 Posts
  • 274 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 1st, 2026

help-circle




  • “That includes one-quarter of women under 50 and 20 percent of men under 50, who said they would not back a qualified female candidate for president, while 13 percent of men and women over 50 said they wouldn’t be open to supporting a woman for president.”

    This is the only line about this, and the poll did not breakdown this derived stat by voter registration. So no. This does not support your thesis that democrat voters didn’t vote for Harris because she was a woman.

    Not only is this survey not categorizing people along partisan lines, they don’t broach the individual topic of Harris’ campaign beyond her disastrous campaign introduction and the lack of primary.

    So better luck next time. Do read the things you post, or better yet, spend more than ten seconds. Because this article and the conntected source poll do not even support the headline it has.




  • Please provide any data, source, or survey for this claim that is not just ‘vibes some racist DNC/Shareblue commentator had.’

    Because despite this claim being screeched by an extremely loud minority of non-intersectional identitarians for literally years at this point, I’ve yet to find a single person that believes this due to actual evidence they can provide.

    Yes, the far-right that Harris spent the entirety of her campaign appealing to did not vote for her partially because of her race and gender.

    Democrat voters that stayed home vs Obama or Biden did not give a shit about Harris’ identity. Just her history and politics, both of which were god awful for someone not running as a Republican.


  • Because unlike AI, there is actual money to be made in space. Elon has little to do with SpaceX besides the grand mission statement, and SpaceX engineers have said as much that employees mostly just humor him and then do the real engineering.

    So yes, they will be going to the moon. Three years ago super heavy couldn’t get out of the atmosphere, now they’ve had several successful launches and catches. 20 years ago reusable rockets were a pipe dream that NASA gave up on because ‘it would be too difficult,’ now there are more Falcon 9 launches than any other rocket in history.

    The business is there, the science is there, the engineering is there; and that means lunar resource hunting is in sight. and with that we have stellar construction, and then we have everything we need to start, at the very least, microgravity clean room manufacturing, if not asteroid mining, and if not potential colonization.

    NASA is doing the science to take out risks for these things, Capital will capitalize on these things after the public pays for the finer points.




  • Are you American? Like seriously you’re at their reading comprehension level.

    The “Fair Share” contribution they’re behind is not literally their proportional fair share. It is the Fair Share agreed upon in the Paris Agreement, which was poorly calculated at the time and didn’t take into account just how fast China was able to improve living standards. That is what the evil Chinese Communist Satanist propaganda says they’re behind on.

    It also didn’t take into account that companies would accelerate industry outsourcing to the point of crippling their home countries’ economies, or that the governments of those countries would help cripple said economy.

    edit: Holy shit your entire account, your entire existence on Lemmy is anti-chinese propaganda. I knew the US was investing heavily lately into this shit but I really hope the paycheck is worth it.









  • You are indeed the person disconnected from reality that that user is referencing.

    Would Harris have been marginally better? Sure, especially if you’re an American and have fully disconnected yourself from all foreign policy decisions.

    Was she a good candidate considering the American electorate? No, she decided to be a Reagan era republican except even more racist and genocidal. We already had one of those running for the other side and those voters don’t change their letter.

    Did she run a good campaign considering the historicity of the “independent voter” as well as the history of right-wing voters in this country? Absolutely not. She did every single possible thing to show she was not at all a choice for anyone not right wing, and we already had a right-wing president running for office on the republican side. She also showed absolutely ridiculous ignorance in the state of the American public by praising Biden during one of the worst economic periods in US history, directly caused by his policies.

    The attitude on most lemmy instances was “vote blue no matter who dies.” You were not allowed to question why 1 million children in Gaza needed to die. You were not allowed to question why Iran needed to be invaded for their “continued transgressions.” You were not allowed to question why Biden intentionally destroyed the primary process and thus removed the entire fucking illusion of democracy in the democratic party. Hell when Biden was the candidate you were not allowed to question why a man who had one of the most public mental declines in world history, literally rivaling Nero, was the presumed candidate for president, especially given he had lower approval ratings than Trump by the end of his presidency.

    You people (pejorative) were worked into this ridiculous cult-like frenzy, I suppose in response to the cult of Trump, not realizing that’s not why Trump won either time.