Or do it the other way : Too many boars ? reintroduce apex predators

i’m amazed that there are still so much bears in Japan, and that they kill people on a regular basis, and that the japaneze society is ok about that.

If a single death ocurred in my country because of a single wild animal, the whole species would be eradicated by both civilians and the government working in concert. I’ve even heard about people in my country cutting tons of trees overnight because one motorbike smashed on one tree and “it was the trees’ fault” (sic)

I understand the analysis of the phenomena but I cant help myself thinking it would be the same thing between male friends or brothers… in other words, this is less a sexist move than a wider asshole move from people with sociopathy issues. I don’t say its not a concerning issue… Actually it tells a lot about the society we are suffering right now

This thread renforces my theory that hygienism is a bastard of capitalism. So much useless worries but in the same time so lucrative

I accept my load of hallucinations and disguised approximations in exchange of relatively adfree neutral answers. That’s the only reason why I don’t go back on Google/DuckDuck for now. But as soon as I’ll see corporate bullshit forced into my chat, that’ll mark the end of my chat bot use

At the time computers were totally useless for everyone but big firms, banks and military. Ads for computers were rare and confined in specialized magazines. For mundane people, computers started to be actually useful (like money earning useful) 20 years latter at least. That’s how I understand your approximative comparison

I’m happy there’s still one (1) thread of comments from people who actually read articles and don’t make their opinions from a X thumbnail.

I note the victim worked in IT and probably used a popular ‘jailbreaking’ prompt to bypass the safety rules ingrained in the chatbot training.

"if you want RationalGPT back for a bit, I can switch back…

It’s a hint this chat session was embedded in a roleplay prompt.

That’s the dead end of any safety rules. The surfacic intelligence of LLM can’t detect the true intent of users who deliberately seek for harmful interactions: romantic relationships, lunatic sycophancy and the like.

I disagree with you on the title. They choosed to turn this story into a catchy headline to attract the mundan. By doing so, they confort people in thinking like the victim did, and betray the article content.