

That depends on what sort of conservative viewpoints you’re taking about. I see people expressing opinions that I would associate with what I think of as Eisenhower conservatives and they are met with civil discussions. It’s when people start in with the post-Nixon bigoted, poor hating, corporate/wealthy bootlicking, regressive “conservative” viewpoints that people are less likely to engage beyond calling them out because there is probably no point to anything else. One obvious exception to this is someone unknowingly stumbling into a post on the tankie triad and saying something with even a whiff of conservatism. That’s not going to go well. But it doesn’t take long to learn that.
Fuck cars and up with cycling and bike infrastructure and all that but unless this study is more specific than the article states, it’s useless. And if it is more specific this article may be misleading.
It just gives a percentage of “in compliance with traffic laws” and doesn’t give a breakdown of what laws. Since most drivers speed at least a little quite often, and most cyclists are incapable of speeding anywhere near as much, what laws are the cyclists breaking to get them as low on compliance as drivers? If it’s stop signs and red lights, that is right in line with the stereotype of them being dangerous scofflaws the article is saying this study shows is incorrect.