- 0 Posts
- 288 Comments
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•We Put A Man On The Moon. We Did It.
2·1 day agodeleted by creator
Well that’s on Bruce, because there’s no “wrong ass” in a threesome. If he wanted a two-on-one, he needed to specify that.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answersEnglish
2·2 days agoSo whether it’s acceptable depends on whether it’s acceptable. I agree!
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answersEnglish
5·2 days agoI’m glad you’re entertaining yourself because I have no idea what you’re prattling about.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Cellphones went from cool form factor mini computers to mandatory personal identification and spying devices
2·2 days agoWhen men were men and TVs were shit.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Cellphones went from cool form factor mini computers to mandatory personal identification and spying devices
3·2 days agoHeh - first one I saw was literally a little suitcase you’d open up with the handset inside. Then they were built into cars for a while. Only THEN came the handheld brick ;D
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Cellphones went from cool form factor mini computers to mandatory personal identification and spying devices
4·2 days agoIt still is, people are just offending at a high rate.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answersEnglish
27·2 days ago91% accuracy is the kind of thing that may sound good… hey! It’s an A minus! But it’s actually completely, totally unacceptable. Imagine if the turn signal wand on your car operated with 91% accuracy. About one in every ten times it would light up the wrong direction. How many accidents are we causing? A lot.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Today I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL Peter Thiel's former lover and alleged "blood boy" died under mysterious circumstances in 2023English
26·3 days agoTo be fair, there probably is a lot of shame and self-loathing that comes after sleeping with Peter Thiel.
There’s a new party being born, the “People Who Hate People Party.”
People who hate people, come together!
“No.”
We’re kind of having trouble coming off the boards, you know.
“Are you going to be there?”
“Yeah.”
“Then I ain’t fucking coming.”
“But you’re our strongest member!”
“Fuck you!”
“That’s what I’m talking about, you asshole!”
“Fuck off!”
“Damn, we almost had a meeting going.”
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
2·3 days agoIf you ban religion AI will become people’s God.
Say more here. It’s an interesting claim. Why do you see this as inevitable? I’m an atheist and AI has not become my god.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
2·3 days agoIf you could ban religion, or ban AI, which would you ban?
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
1·3 days agoTry it. All we have here is someone with a very accommodating employer. It’s not like all Unitarians everywhere now have some court judgment backing them.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
6·3 days agoBut did you type that on your thinking machine?
I’m pretty sure that in Dune, all computers are banned, not just AI. You can’t even have a ship with a navigation computer.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
3·3 days agoThere were already 100 reasons why the Unitarians are where it’s at.
But I really don’t think this is reason 101. All we have here is someone who asked their employer for this and was fortunate enough to have it granted.
That means nothing for anyone else. There is not some national law that all Unitarians have this protected right now.
So yeah… you might as well try on grounds that it offends Allah, because you’ll have the same odds.
stickyprimer@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•You Can Now Get a Religious Exemption From Using AI at WorkEnglish
6·3 days ago“You can now get an exemption” is a huge overstatement.
Someone in North Carolina asked for it and happened to get it from her employer. That does not provide any firm basis for anyone else to follow. Any of us could have tried this last month with the same odds we have now.
Yes they really celebrate blind faith explicitly. Like it makes you a better person if you can put your doubts aside and just believe. And they straight up call us all a flock of sheep. It couldn’t be more on the nose as a scam. This is why every church has a daycare attached to it: if they don’t hook you young they might not get you at all because it’s such a huge steaming pile of bullshit.
It pretty obviously is one. But who is really the governing authority to make it official?